-
AndreE replied to the topic Mines and Minelayer in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 3 months ago
Thank you. You did some great work with that scenario! I checked the mine-rules in the szenario.
In case some people read this without knowing the szenario here is the mine-related rules:
“After deployment, the Axis player may deploy up to six mine tokens (these should be no more than 2″ in diameter). These may not be deployed within 3” of…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Mines and Minelayer in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 3 months ago
So… are there rules for minefields – no
However the only down side would be that a ship is only the bridge – each 1″ of table is 1000 yards of real world, so it would be easy for ships to sail round. For scenarios they yeah its diffidently something that can be expanded. (Currently a couple of us are concentrating on trying to tighten up t…[Read more]
-
AndreE changed their profile picture 1 year, 3 months ago
-
AndreE started the topic Mines and Minelayer in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 3 months ago
Hi,
while exploring the game, I came across the idea on how the game handles mines, mine laying or clearing sea mines. I hope there is no rule topic in the forums that I missed, but so far I couldn´t find any rules in the book or any discussion about mines in the forum.
Beside the idea of simply having a ship that would be classified as a…[Read more]
-
Fred replied to the topic Epic ACW Iron Brigade availability? in the forum General Discussion 1 year, 3 months ago
3 Boxes of Iron Brigade on pre-order. Thank you Warlord Games. Looks like they are resin, too. (which I prefer).
-
Ghettotech replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
Just want to admit that rolling for cover gives a better “feeling” for the defender. You can “defend” and not just get shoot at. Other setting for the mind 😉
-
AndreE became a registered member 1 year, 3 months ago
-
John became a registered member 1 year, 3 months ago
-
Bob Bartels became a registered member 1 year, 3 months ago
-
Justin became a registered member 1 year, 3 months ago
-
Kevin W became a registered member 1 year, 3 months ago
-
JamesP replied to the topic Shield Wall in the forum Hail Caesar 1 year, 3 months ago
Nothing. Disappointed as i would like to include more details for my Normans.
-
coljacksimpson57 replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
Our group fights with a base company formation (usually infantry and using historical TO&E). We set the scenario rules so that the base company eats many of your points and only allows one or two supporting platoons (only one of which could be tanks). We never fielded the lone tank.
-
coljacksimpson57 replied to the topic HE hit on hidden target in building (Rulebook + FAQ) in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
As part of our group’s effort to avoid the 500′ captain, we do not allow firing indirect missions at hidden targets except planned (before deployment) indirect fire at positions that are written down beforehand, with the grid and turn of the mission. These are revealed at the appropriate time and fired. The position may, or may not be o…[Read more]
-
coljacksimpson57 replied to the topic Bazooka vs Bunkers/Tobruk, Artillery Positions & Infantry in Trench systems? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
The reality was that anti-tank grenades, panzerfausts, and bazookas were used against machinegun and anti-tank gun emplacements at least as much as against tanks. The +1 to hit for the panzerfaust & bazooka, with the 1″ HE rule seems to work pretty well for our battles. Anti-tank grenade launchers were less accurate, so we fire them normally a…[Read more]
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Forward Deployers in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
FAQ, p28
“If units with special deployment rules are part of the first wave then
their special deployment rules take precedence. However, in certain
scenarios with first wave it also says no units are allowed on the
board during the start of the game. Do forward deployment units still
deploy in that situation? The scenario in question is Key…[Read more] -
AndrewH replied to the topic Achtung Panzer – Supported Tanks in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
I was wondering if there are plans to issue more cards for the game. I would even be willing to buy PDF cards and print them myself. That wovuld seriously lower the cost for Warlord and they could go nuts with the tank cards… They could sell PDF packs for countries and split them into Early, Mid & Late war variations. Are you listening Warlord??…[Read more]
-
Ken Jacobsen started the topic Forward Deployers in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
Looking for help/direction with this. Certain scenarios state that no units are deployed on the board at the start of he game. I believe I saw somewhere (this forum, FAQ, other forums) that this does NOT apply to Forward Deployers. Can someone please confirm or deny that?
Thanks in advance.
-
SteveT replied to the topic v3 Known Changes in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
I don’t think veterans are +1 to hit. Not heard that mentioned anywhere.
-
coljacksimpson57 replied to the topic v3 Known Changes in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 3 months ago
As for the +1 to hit for veteran troops, we experimented with that in our group last year and found that a veteran company with that rule plus Tough Fighter was just too powerful when matched against a regular company even when the regulars were given twice the points for support teams and tanks. What we settled on was earmarking two soldiers…[Read more]
- Load More
