-
Hauptmann Wolf changed their profile picture 4 years, 11 months ago
-
Hauptmann Wolf changed their profile picture 4 years, 11 months ago
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Loaders in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
Do note that the composition of the Parachute Diversion Section was changed in the latest FAQ to include one more man (although it doesn’t resolve your question):
Page 138, Parachute Diversion Section. Composition should be: NCO and 7 men.
The weapons configuration stated for the Parachute Diversion Section is:
NCO and three men with rifles,…[Read more]
-
Lee started the topic Loaders in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
say a unit has 2 lmgs and 2 piats (parachute diversion section : dday book) can I just have 2 loaders to service all 4 weapons obviously only 2 weapons at a time but is it possible?
or must squad team weapon loaders be nominated to their single respective weapon before the game?
also can a squad team weapon loader fire his regular weapon other…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic British 6 pounder Antitank in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
decoration
models dont get to bring their own cover
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Panzerfaust in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
Yes, you can. See p72, Weapons, Weapon Special Rules, One Shot, second paragraph. Panzerfaust has the ‘One shot’ rule.
-
Steiner started the topic British 6 pounder Antitank in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
<p style=”text-align: left;”>Dear Camerades,</p>
I notice that the model of the British 6 pounder antitank weapon has a brick wall. Does it mean that is it always in hard cover until it moves for the first time? Or is it just decoration? -
Steiner started the topic Panzerfaust in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
Dear comarades,
If you have an infantry squad with a panzerfaust …c can the panzerfaust shoot at a tank and the rest of the squad against a different target?
It would make sense to split fire in this case IMHO.
-
Kar98k replied to the topic Stop the Madness – Heroically over-sized Miniatures. in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
How do Offensive Miniatures (their 28mm WW2 line) measure up next to Warlord Games (their 28mm WW2 line)?
-
Mike replied to the topic The Impossible Conundrum in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 11 months ago
The Russian dude only effects experience level to wound. Kieffer flat out says it takes a 6 to wound him. Thus RAW it takes a 6+.
-
Douglas Hooker changed their profile picture 4 years, 11 months ago
-
Douglas Hooker changed their profile picture 4 years, 11 months ago
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
The sources are vague, not ever stating the type. We know that some units used plug and socket ones at same time. From 1692 we have no more invoices stating plug ones. So……
The pike advocats died slowly, the Swiss French units using both types of bayonet and pike together until 1703.
Many went again for swine feathers, so Russia in 1704.…[Read more]
-
George replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
That’s correct. Plug bayonets had there handle ends shoved up the gun barrels with the blades sticking out so they were hard to dislodge once inserted. Hurt the English when fighting the Scots at the battle of Killiecrankie. The Scots got up close to the English. The English tried to insert their plug bayonets but couldn’t get them inserted in…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
IO – I know nothing about this thread but I am interested in clarifying the posts. George said that the French introduced socket bayonets in 1703, are you saying that the socket bayonet was introduced earlier in France? Secondly LAOK has plug bayonets as being not removable in action, is this backed up by the literature?
Thanks
Garry
Garry
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
Well, 1703 is a bit late for French introduction.
Vauban had advocated a plug bayonet as early as 1669 and the first French line infantry regiments got it 1689. The Fusiliers du Roi had no pikes since creation 1672, being armed with flintlocks as artillery guards. No burning matches for a unit that guarded the artillery Boooom…….
But the…[Read more]
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
Hi George – I think that only the admins can delete posts. It was a great question and I’m sure the answer will be useful for others in the future so probably worth letting it stand.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
Hi Lewis,
When the lists mention “Skirmishers” in the special rules they mean that this unit is in a Skirmish formation and all of the rules for Skirmishers therefore apply. This is a bit different to the items in the ‘useful rules’ section (see p100). The Skirmish rules are quite fundamental, and rules are spread through the book. We are lucky…[Read more]
-
George replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
Never mind. found the answer to my question. French started to use them in 1703 and British used them under Marlborough. Now if I can only figure out how to delete my own post?
-
George started the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 11 months ago
Hello,
Question, I’m looking at the rules in Last Argument of Kings for plug bayonets. I understand that in the War of the Spanish Succession (which I’m building my army for) used socket bayonets? Were they introduced before or during this war? Would the plug bayonet rules work for this conflict or for earlier wars of the late 17th century? Please advise
- Load More
