-
Greg S replied to the topic 6' weapons in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Flamethrowers still suffer the -1 to hit penalty. They do not suffer the -1 PEN penalty that heavy weapons suffer at long range.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic 6' weapons in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
My understanding is for 6in range weapons the Point Blank and Long Range modifiers cancel each other out, except for flamethrowers, they do not suffer the long range penalty as explained on Bolt Action 2nd Ed page 67:
Also, flamethrowers don’t rely on kinetic energy to penetrate a target’s armour, so they don’t suffer the –1 Pen penalty…[Read more]
-
Steiner replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 5 years ago
Hello everyone,
I am Steiner. I am the kid in the block. I am still struggling with the rules and the many possibilities they offer. However, the more I play, the more I love this game.
Please, be patient with me 🙂 because I will ask many questions.
-
Steiner started the topic 6' weapons in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Question:
Pistols, flamethrowers, and any other 6′ weapon.
Do the benefit from AT POINT BLANK? Do they have a long and short range modifier?
-
Steiner changed their profile picture 5 years ago
-
Steiner's profile was updated 5 years ago
-
Steiner started the topic Examples in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Hello everyone,
I am new in the game and forum. I have read the rulebook a couple of times and it’s all highlighted by now. However, I still have a lot of doubts and questions. I have also seen many tutorials on the internet.
I am missing examples. The book sometimes provide some but there should be many more.
Is there a place to see examples…[Read more]
-
Enioch replied to the topic Competitive Ships in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago
I mean, Missouri on her own is more than a match for 2-3 Kongos
Just the AP power, armor and Damage Dice / Critical Hit output is insane.
I don’t know the point cost for Arizona, but if she’s anything like the NewMex she can deal with two of them no problem.
-
Michael became a registered member 5 years ago
-
frederik vanwonterghem became a registered member 5 years ago
-
skh25 replied to the topic Hail Caesar Player Finder (North America) in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years ago
Dallas, Tx
-
skh25 replied to the topic Pike & Shotte Player Finder (North America) in the forum Pike & Shotte 5 years ago
DFW, Texas
-
Paul Nettle replied to the topic What house rules do you guys use? in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Although this post said I was the last to update it, I can’t see my last post.
-
Paul Nettle replied to the topic Motorcycle Squads in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
One of the problems is the generic definition of “rough” ground. Dense woodland, deep mud, sand and rubble are given as examples, and whilst riding a motorbike (particulalry a combination) through sand and mud is not easy it is certainly possible (there are lots of WWII pictures to support this).
Cavalry should not be able to move through dense…[Read more]
-
Paul Nettle replied to the topic Dak Special Transport Group in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Very good indeed.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Fixed, Team movement in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Bolt Action latest FAQ:
Page 67, Fixed special rule, fourth paragraph. The sentence should be changed to read as follows:
When ordered to Run, fixed weapons move the normal 12″ over open ground or 6″ over rough ground, obstacles etc.
It is always a good idea to check the latest FAQs and Errata, as many issues have probably been highlighted by…[Read more]
-
Lee started the topic Fixed, Team movement in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
Hi, trying to workout how movement is done for a unit with team & fixed e.g a MMG,
if a run lets you move 12″ as normal and an advance is rotate only (-1 to fire) then how do you move across an obstacle? or through rough ground? or is it not an option?
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Are Rifle Grenades a small arm or heavy weapon? in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago
*although if you manage to get a 6 to hit as its indirect it would be very unsportsman like to pull out the ‘it doesnt say its a heavy weapon’ argument :p
I understand that can be disputes, but to me is simple to resolve.
HE1 then PEN+1, then follow all rules of heavy weapon. Rules says “heavy weapon add a bonus to the roll to damage” and “HE rou…[Read more] -
Charge The Guns replied to the topic PIKE & SHOTTE (Japanese Army) Discontinued? in the forum Pike & Shotte 5 years ago
Hi Marius, the period is probably not as popular as Napoleonic (Black Powder) or Roman Empire (Hail Caesar), but it has still has plenty of people playing it as evidenced by all of the different social media content I see. Warlord are still selling the Pike and Shotte rules, still have a pretty vast stock line for the period, and have brought…[Read more]
-
Shrokins replied to the topic Competitive Ships in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago
Haha, a four Kongo game would be great. If there were some way to play on-line, I’d do it. Missouri, Arizona, Chicago and Northampton would make it a four on four, 1500 pts vs 1500 pts, guns only deathmatch.
- Load More
