-
SteveT started the topic Rule book and Reference sheet don't agree in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 3 months ago
Not only don’t agree but are opposite in meaning…
From p.72 rules:
- On the roll of a 6 ‘to hit’ by ranged attacks requiring less than 6 to hit.
From Quick Ref sheet
• On the roll of a 6 ‘to hit’ by ranged attacks requiring better than 6 to hit.
Which is it?
-
Stefan Tremblay replied to the topic Leaving the Board in the forum Black Seas 5 years, 3 months ago
If all ships are in the same sector, have you tried moving the board? I.e. if a ship accidentally moves off, you displace all ships on the board to accommodate the missing space… the off board ship would need 10 extra inches : move all ships 10” the other way som the would be off board ship stays on the playing field. Of course it’s not p…[Read more]
-
HellRaiser 7 replied to the topic Blood Red Skies Player Finder (North America) in the forum Blood Red Skies 5 years, 3 months ago
Hi Eric and Everyone!
Im located near Colorado Springs Colorado. I have been building massive Stalingrad tables for Bolt Action so I’m taking a break from all that and working on several German and Soviet Squadrons to use in a Stalingrad Campaign and have a Stalingrad themed Blood Red Skies Table to Demo new players. Will post Pics when as I f…[Read more]
-
HellRaiser 7 replied to the topic Lets see those planes! (Beware 512KB photo size limit) in the forum Blood Red Skies 5 years, 3 months ago
What issues were there with Propellers?
where can I find the Article from Warlord on how to mount the props on?Thanks, Ed
-
Cédric became a registered member 5 years, 3 months ago
-
andrew.dunney became a registered member 5 years, 3 months ago
-
Koin-Koin replied to the topic Virai flying pegs ang flying pegs in general in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years, 3 months ago
Looks like a good alternative. Thanks for sharing it.
The only difference I can notice here is that this one seems to be made of harder plastic. Not sure if it changes anything here.
-
Big Al replied to the topic Inconsistency in rules? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 3 months ago
I know what you mean and I agree in general. However, I think it was done this way to make sure that the unit wasn’t a “invulnerable”. If they had a better morale save, it might make them too hard. Especially when it came to hand to hand combat. This way, it allows for additional protection against missiles without giving them a better save again…[Read more]
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Tank and turret pivots in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 3 months ago
Answer in rulebook and confirmed by FAQ. Turret weapons arc of fire is 360°
Rule book 2nd edition:
“…Turret-mounted weapons. Weapons mounted on turrets can usually fire all around (i.e. into any arc)…”FAQ:
“…Can a turreted vehicle in Ambush react to a movement outside the arc of fire of its weapons? Can the turret turn to react to the…[Read more] -
SteveT replied to the topic Inconsistency in rules? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 3 months ago
Thanks Al.
I cannot see any rational for a stone wall (Moral save) to be in a different category (Shooting mod) for a metal wall (aka armour). z
-
Findo replied to the topic Scale this, creep! in the forum 2000 AD 5 years, 3 months ago
It is not even that Death is too tall, but just too big in proportion as well. His thighs are the same circumference as the waists of the other two for instance.
-
Big Al replied to the topic Inconsistency in rules? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 3 months ago
Not an error. Read the entry on page 88. It is due to their heavy armour.
Now, if they counted as being in cover, it would still be a -1 to hit. So it is as you have suggested, effectively.
-
SteveT started the topic Inconsistency in rules? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 3 months ago
-1 on Ranged attacks vs cataphracts/heavy infantry.
That is odd, since these units were slow and didn’t present fast moving targets. If it is because of their protection, then surely this is equivalent to troops behind cover.
Is this an error? (I am using the Quick Ref sheet that Warlord put out)
Cheers
-
LordRao replied to the topic Tank and turret pivots in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 3 months ago
A tank pivoting its chassis is a turn, and can only be performed with a move.
Turning the turret is not considered moving, so can be done with a Fire order. I wouldn’t allow it with an Ambush order, but that’s RAI.
-
greg started the topic Tank and turret pivots in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 3 months ago
- Got into a minor disagreement at our last game, is a tank pivoting in place considered moving? And if it just pivots its turret is that considered moving? (think I already know the answer to the second but wanted something definitive to show them)
-
Zac replied to the topic Freeborn Privateer army build in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years, 3 months ago
And here are the first set of probes that I have painted.
They are not based yet as tend to do basing in batches of 20 or 30 minis at a time
-
Zac replied to the topic Freeborn Privateer army build in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years, 3 months ago
All of the initial models that I will be using are now built
-
Zac started the topic Freeborn Privateer army build in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years, 3 months ago
I am going to use this thread to post the progress on my Freeborn Privateer army as I build and paint it.
-
Zac replied to the topic Virai flying pegs ang flying pegs in general in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years, 3 months ago
I think Litko sells a product very similar to the Dropzone Commander parts
-
Findo replied to the topic Black Eyes, Like a Dolls Eyes… in the forum 2000 AD 5 years, 3 months ago
Ex-Texas City convict judge Strucker. A rough sculpt but good enough for a supporting antagonist that is executed by his compatriots.
- Load More
