[Colin Bunting]

Yes, we were following those rules, Doug. I’d read the Fast special rule out to my opponent before we started (first game with cavalry) otherwise we wouldn’t have clocked it!

I rolled well most of the game, which is a source of amusement in our group because it’s usually my opponent who has the luck with the dice.

Interesting to see the cavalry should win more than they lose on average. Thanks for that analysis.

[Colin Bunting]

Gotta love that spangly armour! And the sense of humour in the rulebook…

I must admit I haven’t looked at the goblin list in any real depth yet. Or cavalry, before last night.

I really like the game “as is”. My regular opponent was raised on the Reaper Fantasy Wargame (1978?) so he’s taking a bit more talking round. However, I have sent him the “build your own units” pdf from Rick’s blog so he can have his “skeletons with rocks” army. That might do it.

[Colin Bunting]

Thank you for your reply, but I don’t think that’s right. I can’t see anywhere in the rulebook where it says that primary and secondary objectives are different.

Having reread the other forum post (again) I think I get it now – game duration follows the rules on page 113 but victory conditions are set by the scenario. (Not sure why they even included the sentence with the word “most” in. Conversational fluff?)

I do think that needs clarifying in the next edition, particularly as “Victory Conditions” appears to be a sub-heading of “Duration” on page 113 when it shouldn’t be?

We called it a draw!

[Colin Bunting]

Hi.

Name is Colin, from Louth in Lincolnshire (UK). Just started playing Warlords of Erehwon.

That’s it, really! At our club we’ll give most things a try.

Cheers.

[Author]

Posts