Craig

Activity

  • @lee – are you on the Discord server?  theres a couple of gamers who are in the portsmouth and sussex areas on there….

  • my typo, now changed, I did say do use v2 first off… oops!

  • Nat started the topic v3 Known Changes in the forum Bolt Action 1 day, 9 hours ago

    Thought I make a list here of known changes and where the information is coming from!  Please add when you notice something and I’ll update the list.
    Campaign books wont be replaced, but will only be useful for history and the scenarios – New Edition Announcement Article April
    Most units, equipment options from the campaign books will be added in…[Read more]

  • Sorry it was don’t use the v2 points

  • Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! in the forum Bolt Action 3 days ago

    Also the other things to consider

    1) default game size (example lists & play test point) as confirmed by marcion the juggernauts podcast this week) is 1250

    2) (as said by the author in April in the release article) there’s wide scale re-pointing and rule changes

     

    Marcus also said so use v2 rules and points to see what a v3 list will look…

  • 1. Reece – look like a cheap infamy platoon ( 1 infantry unit minimum size as opposed to the normal 2). The t Recce ability being purchasable for all their transports might make it worth it

    2- yeah, they do all say Platoon Commander so you can pay what you want I suppose.  There are going to be loads of officers anyway, so I don’t think it’s a…[Read more]

  • Well the new generic platoon structure (outside of FAOs) is more historical.  Now one size fits all doesnt work but most of the time /for most nations this works

    MMGs & HMGs were in a weapons platoon along with the heavier mortars, only the LMGs and light mortars were in platoons.  Tanks and artillery were not attached singularly to infantry b…[Read more]

  • Well WL are doing a Tournament recommendations …. but you’ll find that the TO will decide once they have the rules in their hands… they may bin the official platoons and say use the v2 ones <shrugs> who knows

  • Ok warlords FB account has confirmed that it’s 1 rifle Platoon unlocks 1 each of the other 5 at the same time

  • [Quote]
    one other restriction – you can only have as many multiples of any Platoon type as you have Rifle Platoons. For example, if you want to field two Armoured Platoons, you’ll need two Rifle Platoons, and so on. Other than that – the choice is yours! [/quote]

    now without the writen rules – this is just Marcus’ chat about it… it reads that i…[Read more]

  • well this is only part of the equation… the rest is still in the dark!

    we dont know what rules are changing
    we dont know HOW the costs are changing
    we dont know how unit composition is changing … it could be that compulsory choices must be taken at full strength.
    etc etc

    all in all it looks like a good change for gaming groups.  The…[Read more]

  • Might be worth checking out (and even contacting) the chaps that run the SNAFU podcast. They focus on BA tournaments in your corner of the world. They also run their own. Very informative about the game in general too.

     

     

  • Mmgs/ hmg change – confirmed – screen shot of vehicle card from the starter set

    Green rule – change confirmed – screen shot of a page of the rules and in the rulebook order page.

     

    Engineers rule – this is from one of the campaign books

     

    List building changes… sounds like it’ll be discussed this week in the v3 article… from talking to WL…[Read more]

  • Do you have discord?

  • It’s part of the long lance national rule…

    There’s a house rule that goes if the bases are touching (or a few mm shy) you count as being in short range unless your weapon would be point blank…. So touching doesn’t mean your turret can hit that DD, but does mean your torp stands a chance of working

  • facebook – a lot of US regions have their own FB group –  & word of mouth / hosted by LGS or gaming groups.

    So all I can say is if you get your stuff from a game store ask in there.

  • Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 1 week, 3 days ago

    As an aside, a community member on FB /Discord is writing whats hoped to be an offical supplement for VaS – Here is his post from the Wardroom.

    <quote>

    last year I began the process of proposing to Warlord that I write an official expansion to Victory at Sea. A few months ago I got the green light to go ahead and start working on the first…[Read more]

  • the missions all have a priority which gives you an extra 10% points, the agreed points or loses you 10% points…. for competative gaminng priority levels are normally ignored.

    Erm… points…. yeah…. with the rulebook points I can take 3 different IJN Destroyers (DDs in short) all for the same 60 points and get 3 completely different type of…[Read more]

  • side note … do look in the ‘news from the wardroom’ as it was worked out that the starter set is NOT designed to have all the ships on the table at the same time.  But rather give you the ships to do the 3 levels of priority as fleet can have (pg 21 in the starter booklet)

  • Hi Doug – sounds like you’re making good progress through your figures.  I would recommend starting a few games as soon as you’ve enough for a couple of brigades for each side.  This will help you get used to the rules and the special Glory Hallelujah rules.  As you get more figures painted you can play bigger battles, which should be easier…[Read more]

  • Load More