Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Closing Fire at an assault and running past enemy units in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 3 weeks ago
1) hmmm ambiguous but RAW would say that if within in 6″ its a surprise charge even if the move taking is 7-12″ as its “when the charge is declared” I’d play it as the move personally… but one for an FAQ /errata
2) its 1″ away from the wall of the building AND 1″ away from the vehicle so there would need to be a 3″ gap for them to move…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic 3rd vs 2nd in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Thanks for all the replies.
Sounds to me like it’s becoming a bit more “gamey”. For me, 2nd captures very well the desperation of men being pinned under fire and the gradual gains being made here and there, with so many (even small) decisions having significant consequences. None of the online games I have watched for 3rd seem to capture that at…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic 3rd vs 2nd in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 4 weeks ago
Thanks, It was the more ‘kill’ part that was bothering me. Does that detract from tactics or does it actually make people more realistically cautious ?
-
SteveT started the topic 3rd vs 2nd in the forum Bolt Action 2 months ago
I am wondering if it’s worth buying 3rd or not. I am thinking not but…
I’m interested in the opinions and findings of those who have played both sets
From the 8 or so games I have seen on videos it, 3rd seems to produce more erratic outcomes and needs more rolling.
-
George started the topic Recommendations for New Warlord ACW Epic products in the forum Black Powder 2 months ago
Hello Warlord designers,
I hope you read these posts as well as players.
As you develop Epic ACW figures here is what I would hope you will make. Please take notes.
1. U.S. Colored Troops – Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery. Facial features of “white” soldiers don’t match those of “black” soldiers. i.e. They don’t have zz top beards.
2. Sailors…[Read more]
-
George replied to the topic Black Powder Player Finder (North America) in the forum Black Powder 2 months ago
I’m in Fort Worth. We’re you at Millennium ConT?
-
Nat replied to the topic Soviet Lend Lease tanks in the forum Bolt Action 2 months ago
Lend-Lease stuff is probably going to wait till next October with the armies of book 🙁
till then I’d use a British armoured pltn as a lend-lease armd pltn to add the Shermans & Churchills. (British shermans can workout about 5pts more expensive than the US ones..)
(I’ve already got my local clubs agreement to do that with my lend-lease shermans)
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing Parts in the forum Bolt Action 2 months ago
WL have a very good customer service dept… best off emailing them even if you dont require the part so that they’re aware
also include the name on the packing slip (if you still have it) & where you got it from incase its a batch issue rather than just misfortune that you and your mate had the same thing missing.
As a side note I had a scout…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Building a gentleman's war minis for v3 in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
IIRC the gentelmans war gives a nice rounded v2 list… so i’d go with that and then see what you need (if anything) to add to make a legal v3 list.
OR you can wait till the end of January and get hold of the new armies of Germany book which could change your mind with what you want to build.
-
Nat replied to the topic Artillery Observers and Air Observers in Open Topped Transports in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
You cant give units inside a transport a Fire! order, only Down, Advance or Run.
So no they cant call in their attack..
-
Nat replied to the topic Bersaglieri and french D1 & D2 tanks in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
Mike, two things,
1) most game systems keep points cost calculations in-house to stop people creating their own units that can then break the systems. We can extrapulate a number of the costs but with tanks you have roundings and (hopefully) proportional costs. To put a build your own tank program out is bad for buisness.
2) what we have in B…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Bersaglieri and french D1 & D2 tanks in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
the v3 get-you-by lists are copy and pastes with minor CORE rule changes from the armies of books … historical unit changes werent updated – even those that have been in the v2 FAQ for YEARS!
The campaign book corrections likewise havent been factored in to the get-you-by lists…
We currently dont have any dates for when the minor nations…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Version 3, first games in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
2. … what about FAOs? still allowing them to spot for any non-inexpeirenced indirect weapon?
-
Nat replied to the topic Buildings in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
Barrage or any indirect that hits a building /unit in a building then tests to see which floor it explodes on! – You can either target empty building OR units within building, but you cant target buildings that have units inside. (gameplay reasons)
From v2 (cant recall if majorly different in v3) any level where you could stand /place models is…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Buildings in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago
So buildings… in real life are great hiding places… right up until spotters then they become death traps when targeted by artillery.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Haha yes, so we shall see whether in 3rd Ed will Warlord Games also “extrapolate” the rules for Officer and HQ Units in transport to that of Spotters in transports as well? Or will they say something else and disallow spotting from soft-skinned and open-topped vehicles?
Yes I had seen in some of the campaign books that US spotters were allowed in…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago
oh I fully agree that WL could and SHOULD have read through their own v2 FAQ and made sure that every point was covered in the rules…. but they didnt so the v3 FAQ is going to be longer than that of v2 🙁
there was a couple of spotter vehicles in the later campaign books…
My point was that spotters are only 10 points each and not locked to…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago
The reason I asked is because in the 2nd Edition FAQs this is exactly the explanation given for spotters not being able to spot from transports … because officers and HQ units’ abilities do not affect units outside the transport 🤷♂️ I believe in the 2nd Edition there was only one German vehicular unit that can act as a mobile…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago
I’d say no, they’re not HQ units so why would they get the explict HQ allowance for seeing /working out of transports…. plus their 10 points each with multiple buffs from v2.
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago
(dont worry I know what you mean …. I have a 3rd Ed metal sisters army….)
v3 was needed because of the size of the FAQ… but seen as the army books (less germany) were all v1 and the v2 rulebook lasted 12 years!
- Load More