Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Flossacke in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 11 months ago
dont forget the DV… I think the little boat has a 4+ instead of the normal boats 3+
-
Nat replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 11 months ago
I agree with @Charge the Guns… There is a rules precedent for instructions that cant be completed with the number of orders rolled (artillery limbering) carries over to the next turn. So I would go with that… if you tell a unit to go through woods and dont get enough orders they do as much as they can but stop when they run out of them.
Eg…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Flossacke in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 11 months ago
well empire in flames (and other campaign books) have this as a generic boat:
Waterborne (deep & shallow water only, move has half track), Slow & Open-topped.
- Assault boat/ life-boat/ improvised rafts etc
Cost: 16 (inexperienced) 20 (regular) 24 (vet)
Damage: 3+
Transport: 16 men
Option: remove May not Run for +10 points
Rules: May not…[Read more]
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 11 months ago
Hi Arcole, in my view a unit could be ‘stranded’ in open order just outside of a wood while it tries to get the order off to move in or reform after coming out. Being in open order it should suffer the -1 for skirmishers in melee so that it is vulnerable to being attacked.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic The Battle of Freezing Hill in the forum Pike & Shotte 2 years, 11 months ago
Great looking game, RR, with lovely looking armies 👍. I really like the way you have done the roads over the fur terrain matt.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Latest additions to my Napoleonic Armies in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 11 months ago
Lovely additions, Ferg. The Spanish troops look especially fabulous!
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Lord General in the forum Pike & Shotte 2 years, 11 months ago
Many thanks, IO and RR 👍.
He was a controversial character, for sure.
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Lord General in the forum Pike & Shotte 2 years, 11 months ago
S U P E R B !!!
May be an Irish view of the Lord General. 😉
-
Charge The Guns started the topic Lord General in the forum Pike & Shotte 2 years, 11 months ago
<p class=”p1″>I needed a Lord General command base for my New Model Army. Started with a Warlord metal figure and then converted to add some whimsical character. Changed the hat for a classic three bar English pot, and went on from there. </p>
<p class=”p1″>May be somewhat inspired by Revelation 6:8, “And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
Just some house rules for people to look at based for a competative pickup game…
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
https://warlord-community. warlordgames. com/resources-victory-at-sea/
remove the double spaces after the full stops.
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
@GregS – Dogfights happen at the end of the gunnery phase, so Bomber will always be able to attack a ship they are in B2B with before the fighters get a chance to shoot them down…. actually engaging bombers (of any type) that are touching a ship is the worst thing to do as it stops defensive AA from targeting them.
Gunnery phase is effectively…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
I will say there are some confussing answers in the FAQ… most of which are to do with points… (one of the reasons why there are a couple of alternative point systems over in the wardroom facebook group).
The FAQ also doesnt cover 100% of the stat related issues or rules interpretations (ie another being the returning ships diagram… is it…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
https://warlord-community. warlordgames. com/resources-victory-at-sea/
remove the double spaces after the full stops!
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 11 months ago
All of these questions are in the offical FAQ (i’ll post a link in a min)
Kamikazes dont apply modifiers as per the FAQ… all flights hit on the flights chart EXCEPT FOR WHEN ATTACKING SUBS (for some STUPID reason!)
DP fires when the ship fires NOT when the AA batteries defensive fire at the start of the gunnery phase.
If you look in the ‘news…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Fortress Budapest Play Through in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 12 months ago
Keep ’em coming!
-
Nat replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 12 months ago
(Disclaimer – I dont have Epic ACW rules)
If the Whipped unit always tests at all damage taken then yeah its 2D6-3 Vthe chart. As you dont roll on the chart until you have reached your stamina level a reduced stamina means that your opponent has to do less shooting to cause it to take that first check.
The rule set isnt a tightly written one…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 12 months ago
In addition to Nat’s explanation, a unit can be ‘whipped’ by shooting without being shaken if it has the ‘wavering’ special rule. However this is the only case I can think of as ‘whipped’ units can’t be rallied.
-
Nat replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 12 months ago
Brigade Moral, if you lose more than 50% of a brigade its broken and retires from the battle. So if you have 3 units in your brigade and 1 is whipped, If/when one of the other 2 units os destroyed then you only have 1 unit left, which is less than the 50% threshold so the brigade retires (runs away)
A units stamina is how much punishment it c…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Mixed formation skirmishers and moral saves in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 12 months ago
Sorry but I have to disagree, the rules specifically say that the -1 to hit as a skirmish target is applied. Nowhere in the rules does it say the mixed formations are treated as skirmish targets ‘in all respects’. If it was intended that the morale save did not apply we would hope that Rick would have said so. Obviously people can play this…[Read more]
- Load More