Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Question about the models. in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
going to say 3 things…
1) the game is actually scale agnostic… in fact talking to some of the playtesters… they didnt playtest it at 1:1800 but at other scales they had at home…
2) warlord arent the only manufactors… come join us in the Victory at Sea Wardroom (unofficial) group on facebook for more
3) the bases arent that bad, I for one…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
No its not clear, if its clear then there wouldnt be these questions…
plus where are you getting 1 page scenario from?… we are looking at theater lists… now my wife (who doesnt do anything with wargamming or that much about history unless its about art) just had a look and agreed that the rule says no artillery units and then said if AA…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Well Master Chief, that screenshot shows where to find the entry for a type. It does not say that all under one header are the same. Like the vehicles in that table that can be very different like tank and tow.
Nat, you write: ” I read it when I got the Stalingrad book and went..’eh?? that doesnt make sense’ stopped looked at the spec…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Flamethrower against vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Latest FAQ:
The weapons chart shows that flamethrowers have D6 or D6+1 shots. Is that correct? Or should that be a 1 instead?
Yes, it should be a 1 in both cases. The issue is that the weapons chart tries to be helpful by stating ‘D6’ for the number of shots. D6 (or D6+1) is the number of hits caused by a hit, not the number of shots. You rol…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
A look at the 2nd edition Armies of Germany book (see attached) lists several types as an artillery unit.
-
Nat replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Well common sense isnt common :p … what makes sense to me (due to my time in the army) might not make sense to my brother who’s never served, so who do you write the rules for me or him?
Saying i’m all right Jake (as you just did, saying you dont have an issue understanding it) IS the problem.. I read it when I got the Stalingrad book and w…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Well, for IO, the son of a WW II artillery officer the wording is 100 % clear.
I think that there had been a change in gamers, today old common knowledge is lost. In the rules we used in the 70’s nobody expected a wording that explain basics. The Stalingrad page 135 tells everything you need for that scenario under Off-Map Battery You can h…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
The issue comes from the wording warlord uses… IF they said no artillery guns instead of no artillery units then there wouldn’t be as much of a problem. Due to how warlord write the theater lists….
I say it’ll still be a problem because Artillery Units is a rules term for any large weapons team, and includes rules such as immune to…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
I can’t see any problem. The special rules tell the historic situation and most users will see that only the technically / tactical non artillery AT and AA guns are for use on western bank.
No artillery units on western bank here just means indirect firing true artillery that was served by the forward observer.
On p. 136 and other W…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic The Rulebook is coming in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
On the way ……. Hope you re not living on the continent. Brexit and/or snow block my UPS parcel since 28th. Tracking a bad joke. Delivery announced for last monday. Still!
-
Nat replied to the topic Storage for 28mm in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
if your in the UK look at simple storage boxes
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Storage for 28mm in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
For 28mm storage I use second hand stuff. For example plastic drawers that I got for free, one can put 30 of them one on another. Inside high enough for foot soldiers.
Others are in candle cardboard boxes. The big ones used on altar. As professional historian I worked for old Templar church and that connection I got them as recycling. They ta…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Warlord rules writers & proof readers make mistake and over complicate simple rules…. in other new water is still wet!
This is the main issue with warlord rules, whilst they write some of the easiest to read rule books there ability to describe the rules, and refer to what they’ve already written is some times a bit lacking (I point to…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
It is really glaring as the entries are exactly side by side.
This was also the case with the previous FAQ which contained 2 contradicting answers on targeting empty buildings with a multiple launcher. That was only rectified in this latest one. Maybe this (the no artillery issue) will be rectified in the next version.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Charged unit in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
It should have no orders taken if it survives. I guess usually the target will react by shooting to try and at least reduce the number of models in (if not kill) the charging unit, so that it (the target) stands a higher chance of surviving. But if you believe your unit being targeted will survive, you need not react and can keep its Order for a…[Read more]
-
SteveT started the topic Q about FAQ in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
New FAQ today has this about Stalingrad campaign. We had the same question, But the FAQ answer didn’t help.
“The special rule “Off-Map Battery” (on pages 137 & 138 of “Campaign: Stalingrad”) states, “Soviet players are not allowed
to take artillery units”. This in turn is seemingly contradicted
in the (“NOT A STEP BACK!” REINFORCED PLAT…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic 1870 – French infantry colours in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
I’m going to guess that the Fanions are the same as the 1st Empire if the eagles are…but that is a guess
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Yugoslavian army list in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Haha please no more campaign books 😆 I am still waiting for PDFs of the Mariana and Canadian Sector books …
-
Nat replied to the topic Yugoslavian army list in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
more likely they havent looked at the balkans in depth…..
next campaign book any one? Italian invasion of Albania and failed invasion of Greece with the german intervention!
new models – none needed (although the greeks could get a unit or two)
new units – a few Greek & Balkan units… possibly an italian one or two..
new theater lists – 1…[Read more] -
Master Chief replied to the topic Yugoslavian army list in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
Haha perhaps Warlord learnt their lesson from that “outing” … a list for an army that surrendered after 6 hours isn’t going to be used much 😆
- Load More