Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Timing of Artillery Declaring a Target and choosing indirect fire in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 10 months ago
basically the timing is:
you pull the order die and decide the gun is going to fire
you pick what and how you are going to fire ie HE or AP, indirect or direct
opponent decides to go down or not
you measure range
you roll the dice.* (including to see if hit by the FAOs artillery strike) -
Nat replied to the topic Epic Battles: Allied Troops & Missing Models Help in the forum Black Powder 1 year, 11 months ago
donlt play epic so cant help on those questions – but on the model road map…
NOPE, its a cross your fingueres and hope, theres one or two models that where seen last year (either during the open day or during last years 12 days of christmas) that still havent been released /put up for pre-order & then you get things like EPIC BP which wasnt…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Battle of Britain Starter in the forum Blood Red Skies 1 year, 11 months ago
The battle of britian starter box went out of production a couple of years ago unfortunatly and was (Eventually) replaced with the Battle of Miday box, there was a direct ‘battle of britian bundel’ which is something different.
But yeah this is one of those games that doesnt actually NEED a starter box to get started in with….all you need is…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Epic Black Powder Big Issue HELP in the forum Black Powder 1 year, 11 months ago
No I don’t think there is anything wrong with you. Epic clearly means more figures to the unit than normal, which does look good. But as others have pointed out the Epic battalions fill the same frontage as their 28 mm equivalents. Similarly the full scale buildings also cramp the space on the battlefield unrealistically. I have wargamed in 15mm…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Infantry Forming Square in the forum Black Powder 1 year, 11 months ago
You are referring to the optional rule in Clash of Eagles, for units in line formation with the must form square rule. The command test is used to determine whether the unit forms square, a disordered square or none at all. As big Al said it is not in the rules per se. I don’t use it myself.
Garry
-
Big Al replied to the topic Infantry Forming Square in the forum Black Powder 1 year, 11 months ago
You have to be wary of podcasters making these statements. If it isn’t in the main rulebook, then it is either an alternative rule suggestion from one of the supplement books (including the rules that come with the Epic set) or it is a house rule that they are passing off as an actual rule.
it is certainly not in the main BP2 rulebook.
-
Nat replied to the topic Sd.Kfz. 10/4 with Flak 38: Redundant? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 11 months ago
gah this is ww2 german equipment we’re talking about here… if theres not 4 different vehicles all doing the same thing is it even historical
:p
-
Nat replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 1 year, 11 months ago
new invite posted…
https://discord.gg/rFmsT8Ph -
Nat replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 1 year, 11 months ago
new official discord link – please note it expires in 7 days time (so 21st of Dec)
-
Nat replied to the topic General doubts in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 11 months ago
What can I say….I like the game, but feel its let down in part by the rulebook. I mean some parts of the rulebook could do with being tidied up as the references they need to make sense are missing. Or the rules have been changed and theres still references to those rules in the book (most noticably in the stats section with refits about DC r…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic General doubts in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 11 months ago
Fighters can attack MTBs which is why they have an entry in the hit chart…. any thing bigger is too heavily armoured for their calibre ammo to do seriouse harm to.
-
Nat replied to the topic General doubts in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year, 11 months ago
Only during the gunnery phase.
Reason- moving in to base contact is just moving in to range and not maneouvering over the ship there for the local X trait trigger doesnt activate.
Note its only Local X that triggers during the movement phase not the AA battery itself. ie a ship with AA battery 3 + local 2 will use 2 AD against every flight…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Information Needed on ISU 122 /152 Resin Kit in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 11 months ago
from memory both hatches are seperate I’ve put an open one and use a bad squiddo female tank commander on my 152
-
Nat replied to the topic Way to block people on this forum? in the forum General Discussion 2 years ago
thanks Craig
-
Craig replied to the topic Way to block people on this forum? in the forum General Discussion 2 years ago
We have deleted the spam account.
We have also had to disable email notifications for private messages for now to prevent it being used by these spam bots.
-
Nat replied to the topic Need New Project Idea in the forum General Discussion 2 years ago
Hi Pat,
this sort of question will get noticed and more answers in the Historical /Bolt Action sub forum…
However, Paras are a valid sub faction army.. in fact they make a great core of a force then you can just swap out what supports you give them (ie jeeps, tanks, transports etc) to change up how they play
-
Nat started the topic Way to block people on this forum? in the forum General Discussion 2 years ago
As said … is there a way of blocking people spaming (/phishing) you via PM on this forum?
-
Nat replied to the topic General doubts in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years ago
1. … Warlord have said you go by FAQ then rulebook, then the cards (IIRC its 450!…. yes warlords points are abit off in places…)
2 … Subs have 4(!) depths – surfaced, submerged, running deep & hidden – to keep teleporting subs to min hidden is to the grid square/sector – check out the subs 101 file I’ve uploaded in this thread…[Read more] -
Craig replied to the topic Hail Caesar Epic Battles? in the forum Hail Caesar 2 years ago
Thats a good idea! 😛
-
Nat replied to the topic Manhandling Artillery in the forum Black Powder 2 years ago
TBH the move and fire ability of Manhandling guns is the only reason to use it!…. so never on horse artillery
Also any heavy /seige artillery cant be manhandled.
- Load More