Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Are there any non-open top 7+/8+ vehicle with a Medium Howitzer besides BT-42? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
With a medium howitzer… not that I can think of…. closest I can think of is
SU76i – soviet book pg 51, DV 8+, light howitzer / med AT
-
SteveT replied to the topic Japanese using the Bren Carrier in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
<h3>Ostfront: Barbarossa to Berlin, page 91</h3>
In terms of Bolt Action, a strict application of the rules for force selection does not normally allow you to field tanks and guns from other forces – however, you can use captured vehicles and equipment as long as you pay the right points for them and they are taken simply to replace an equi…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Russian Regiments: 2 or 3 stands? in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 4 months ago
Russian regiments arent any bigger, they just have a higher stamina to represent the hardyness and stoic nature of the Russian peasantry
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
And there (germanys lack of hardward, US excesses of hardware) you have the difference between pickup game & simulation :p
Limited number of equipment is NO reason not to put it in the list (how many vehicles already in the game were limited… a lot :p)…. and as for flamethrowers, I’d put one in – if someone invaded Sweden they’d pretty soon…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
<argh… forum ate my reply>
So short version – SA80, I’m going off the armourers and not reports!… The Bren, that is just what Ive read, so if its wrong fair enough…
Ranges of engagement are only part of what generates the rules, in v1 LMGs had 6″ less range and 1 less shot but got buffed to V2 because they werent being used… so at 6″…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
As Nat stated there should be no longer Swedish rifle range. That it is 19th century is the reason for the range, in that time technical doctrine in all countries asked for amo able to break a cavalry charge starting fire at long range.
Svedish cavalry still trained in mid of war the mounted charge, strange because most had dropped the s…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
@generaljimbo81 – I’d have said thats covered by the TLs having extra slots
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
A couple of points….
1)Due to BA’s homogenisation of weapon stats I wouldnt give extra range to the sweedish.. as its not just the weapon range but contact range that is taken in to account in game
EG the standard Lee Enfield 303 is accurate to a mile…. the Bren (like the SA80 & LSW) were ‘de-accurisied’ to make them less accurate so they can…[Read more] -
SteveT replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
Under some classifications , the BAR is type of LMG, since its about how it was used not its ROF or mechanisms.
See The Encyclopedia of Weapons of World War II, under the US BAR entry.
” It may be regarded as a rather light machine-gun or as a rather heavy assault rifle, but in practice it was used as a form of light machine-gun.”(same for the…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
-
SteveT replied to the topic Multi Launcher – Line of Sight or Spotter in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
A unit that can have a spotter say so under “options”. So its normally stuff like Med/Hvy mortars and howitzers.
So, your Katyusha does not have that option.
But also note the part on p.71 under Indirect fire that allows them to fire against enemies even if friends are in the way.
-
Nat replied to the topic Looking For Japanese “Betty” Bomber in the forum Blood Red Skies 2 years, 4 months ago
A mate of mine 3D printed my Bettys as a gift so there are STLs out there… however I think I put the wings on slightly wrong so they are a bit bowed :p
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
@Generaljimbo81 – issue is if you start allowing lots of light mortars with their move and fire in lists you are removing one of Japanes key distinguishing factors (the grenadier squads)….better to give the light mortar as an option to the HQ (ie the LT allows you to take 0-1 light mortar then the mortar slot allows you to take 0-1 of light,…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
RE snipers – if you make them any better you need to up the points… theres an argument for upping the points alread
RE medics – my view is: make them a team of 1 -4 (so you measure from any member of the unit). And you you add 3 extra rules
Medical Orderly : +1 to the dice on frindly units for each additional member in the unit
Hippocratic o…[Read more] -
SteveT replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
On medics: make them too cheap and they will be in everyone’s army, so I think it would work better if they were able to roll to help any casualties, no matter from HE, etc.
-
Nat replied to the topic Slowness of the game in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 4 months ago
With a number of games I find that having a cheat /crib sheet with the turn order and and event rolls on 1 or 2 sides of A4 + a printed out excel sheet of the stats for the units in my army + a sheet with JUST the special rules my army has on means that if you ask me a question I’m going to look at 1 of 3 bits of paper & not a book … if I c…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
MMG /HMG – was thinking a “focused fire (team)” arc (2″ linear arc centered on the MG) which does D3 pins instead of 1
Support Teams – expanding the unit types to HQ team (main person + 0-2 infantry), Squads (as now) support teams (limited squad, every one has the rule like medics), support weapon teams (immune to snipers etc), support gun team…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
Some reduction in cost of MMG/HMG teams. Right now, bit too easy to lose them to snipers, etc.
Air observer – make blunders far rarer even if that means raising cost. Right now, you have to pray you don’t blow your own troops up.
Include in the main book all the bits that got added for terrain and obstacles in other books.
Smoke. Make it…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Homebrew:Thoughts on this idea for MMG/HMG teams? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
“Vehicle MGs (and autocannons) don’t have Fixed”. Yes, that was kind of my point. I think most people would want consistency to any new improvements to MG rules that work across all types. Tricky.
-
SteveT replied to the topic Homebrew:Thoughts on this idea for MMG/HMG teams? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
I think they might need something, but I am not sure this fits in with MGs in tanks somehow?
The problem for me is they are ideal sniper targets — feels seems to me that the sniper always takes out the only one of the team who can use the weapon and thus eliminate the whole team….
One easy change I was tempted with is “hit from this weapon 1 e…[Read more]
- Load More