Activity
-
Big Al replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
Fair enough, Garry! I just thought it worth adding.
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
Big Al, ‘failed to mention’, I think you will find, I thought it was irrelevant to the discussion. All the best Garry
-
Big Al replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
Further to what Garry has said, the centrepoint of the unit frontage is generally used if your units are based a little differently. If you have, say, six bases each consisting of four figures, you will probably find that you do not have a central figure. So, using the unit’s front centre makes more sense. If, like me, you have six bases c…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
BP is pretty clear that the only range that matters is the distance between the leader model/centre of front to the closest visible base of the target. If this distance is in range, the whole of the firing unit and the whole of the target are in range. The rules explicitly states this. The best way to picture it, for muskets, is the 18 inch…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
Thanks for posting this, I wondered what the differences were. I have too many 15mm already to divert to Epic. Anyway regarding your question, I would have thought a leader model was the same in all formats, it is the leader model that determines visibility not a leader base, so in a 13.5 mm model of 5 ish mm wide, it cuts down the options. The…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Using a pak 43 or worse a 12.8 cm Kanone 81/2 in bolt action? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 10 months ago
The German AT gun servicewas ranked by size.
8,8 and 12,8 cm AT guns had been part of the Atrmy and Corps artillery. So not in division. They got used mainly to defend “Schwerpunkte” where large enemy Tank forces had been expected. The weight caused the static use, sometimes under concrete. It was essential to protect the flanks. And g…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Practical question about Carrier models, and the Catastrophic Explosion rule in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
1) yes under the points system in the rulebook Carriers include the number of flights in the stats, these are chosen (type and role) when you write the list – you can end up with more flights (cost wise) than the carrier cost you quite easily!!
2) Yep for a slight chance of a catastrophic explosion (6 to damage, 4+ to confirm, 10 on a D10…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Assault of New Guinea Question in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 10 months ago
I’d lean to the view that its platoons that cant be mixed not the force as a whole… this is backed up by the fact you can take armoured platoons alongside infantry platoons in the stalingrad campaign book.
-
Nat started the topic Models to move to SkyTrex in the forum Cruel Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
-
Big Al replied to the topic Household Cavalry regiment morale (Albion Triumphant 2) in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 10 months ago
Beat me to it! 😆
-
Nat replied to the topic Hold Fast Supplement – Tease! in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
pictures of new ‘modern’ merchants with a rought ETA of ‘soon after Hold Fast’ -
Nat replied to the topic Hold Fast Supplement – Tease! in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
better picture of the 2nd rate!
-
Nat replied to the topic Hold Fast Supplement – Tease! in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
a 2nd rate… as shown off on FB by Gabrio
-
Nat replied to the topic Bunch of questions. in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
I think you’ve stumped the people who play! (I’ve not played the game yet so don’t want to answer)
Might be worth asking on FB /emailing the service guys to pass on to the rules team
-
Nat replied to the topic Hold Fast Supplement – Tease! in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 10 months ago
So Gabrio has just posted this on FB!…. my guess is possibly an end of the month pre-order?My wallet hopes not :p
-
Nat replied to the topic Thoughts after a few games in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
TBH with dice, I agree, with the changes that warlord made to VaS from mongooses v2 beta, I was surprised that they didnt move over to the D10 to hit with more possible modifiers – afterall they make Cruel Seas which is a D10 to hit.
Size stat…. thats going to be a lot of grey area’s… such as small pre-dreadnought battleships & super…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft queries – shooting with and at in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
The AD doesn’t equate directly to 1:1 for AA…
Its an approximation of effectiveness
Somethings lean towards gameplay and others to simulation… I like this game as an into level game to the world of ww2 historical naval gaming…if you catch my drift
-
Nat replied to the topic smoke placement and line of sight in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
Yeah… I’ve had to accept that warlord do framework games, not rulesets 😝
-
Nat replied to the topic Thoughts after a few games in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
if you pop over to the ‘news from the wardroom’ thread I’ve put some documents about the gameplay including a ‘cheat sheet’ for the full turn order so your not flipping through the book all the time..
theres also a house rules document that helps cover some of the points… however about the overhorizan type 93 shot… its a Beyond Horizon Shot,…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic smoke placement and line of sight in the forum Victory At Sea 2 years, 10 months ago
yeah I’ve questioned this as well…. (and some of the online people got snarky over it…but meh )
however the clearest way round it (for a game play on the table perspective) is to place the smoke behind the model touching the base – and yes this will allow LoS to be drawn over the ship thats laying the smoke. This is the way I play it… but…[Read more] - Load More