Activity
-
SteveT replied to the topic Unit sizes? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
Precisely historically accurate unit sizes are not particularly important in skirmish-scale games as the action is not taking place on the parade ground, but mid-war or mid-fight, where forces varied due to shortages, official reorganisation, or on some temporary detachment/attachment at this scale at this point in time. Of course something…[Read more]
-
Craig replied to the topic Really weird glitch whenever I post something in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
Is it still happening? We have done upgrades on the forum which may have corrected this.
-
Craig replied to the topic Wargames Annual 2022 Released Featuring Some of my Work! in the forum Hail Caesar 3 years, 1 month ago
Great job! Nice work.
-
Nat replied to the topic I ordered the French the minute it was for sale, my question is… in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
Its normally a 3 month pre-order window with Warlord. And is down on the UK site as as release date January….which can be any time in January :
One of the reasons why they’ve split the website down is to allow for delays in releases however so far its only been a couple of weeks between the US & UK with other systems (VaS, BA) that I’ve heard…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Unit sizes? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
lack of concistancy in a warlord book!
Ok jokes aside, the Armies of … entries are generic to cover multiple years and doctirine /organisation changes (for example the Soviet LMG squad 6-12 men, 1 to 2 LMGs only in mid war where they ever 12 man with 2 LMGs) where as the Campaign entries are (in theory at least) true to that campaign.
(ps this…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Austrian and Russian command penalties in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
(disclaimer… not got my Russians on the table yet)
yeah fair point on the Artillery front…
As a Russian I want multiple small bdes for the breakpoint and the fact that half of my Bde commanders have to be SR7. So multiple bdes of 1 regiment works better for me (again in theory)However, dont forget that BP is a framework rule system, so if…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Austrian and Russian command penalties in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
For both its easy to make it a none entity rule… As the rule only affects battalions of different regiments (or cavalry regiments*)
The russians can take a brigade of 1 regiment… that may or may not have multiple battalions, The one brigade where you need multiple battalions from different regiments is the grenadier brigade which…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Marines of the Guard lacing colour in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 2 months ago
It was Laiton ou aurore jaune – Golden yellow. The plate was yellow brass, not gilded. So slightly darker .
Collection Raoul / Brunon had an original Tschako, made by Chapelier in Paris, the guards supplier.
The field unifom 1812-15 was more plain. No red cuffs, no elaborate lacings- Tschako with oil skin.
-
Nat replied to the topic Scenarios for Sniper & Observer deployment in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
I’d take it to include the table edge where your models can enter the table from.
So with ‘meeting engagement’ I’d say cant be 12″ away from the enemies table edge OR an already deployed forward deployment unit!
-
Nat replied to the topic Scouting points and radar in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 2 months ago
Only the ship with Radar gets the benefit.
Think of it this way, you make a pool of dice for the aircraft, a pool of destroyers & cruisers without radar, a pool for Destroyers & cruisers with radar & a 4th pool for those with advance radar.
Pools 1 &2 can be rolled together as they are a 5+, pool 3 is a 4+ with a re-roll & pool 4 is a 3+ with a…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Status of new campaign book and Italians in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
the book ‘soft underbelly’ was released a couple of weeks ago, and is available for purchase through the UK store (other stores dont always show the same info)
the units /army deals are still up for pre order (they may be a Feb release……)
-
Nat replied to the topic soviet army dog mine anti tank teams in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
@Stuart….. intresting take. As the wording doesnt say nearest eligible vehicle, and its not being targeted I’ve always read it as the closest soviet vehicle irrespective of order die gets a dog run under it. Kinda like how you pick a unit to be shot when your firing unit FUBARs…. the proximity is the only targeting restriction.
-
Nat replied to the topic Still not clarified: rules for the DAK Aufklärungsgruppen in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
Some of warlord do read these forums…. however if you email info@warlordgames.com then one of the service guys will pass the question on to the rules team*… you should get an offical answer then.
*if they get asked enough they should put it in to the FAQ – they have with the VaS ones that I’m aware of
-
Nat replied to the topic Still not clarified: rules for the DAK Aufklärungsgruppen in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
oh I agree totally… I think consistancy and clarity* is important between books (& factions in a game!)…. well…. lets just say I made my point clear to one of warlords authors**…. (and similarly warlord themselves, never did get an answer to that email about proof reading in their books :p )
*as in not needing a FAQ /errata to find out…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Still not clarified: rules for the DAK Aufklärungsgruppen in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
The issue is a mix of …. warlord dont have the same authors for the campaign books, os htere is little consistancy between the books – either rules or units &warlord try not to FAQ/Errata the campaign books
So, not having the books in question I would go with
1) IF its purchased as a single unit then it provides one order die & is activated…[Read more] -
Big Al replied to the topic Napoleonic Skirmishers in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 2 months ago
All of that is in the main rulebook for Mixed Formations. Clash of Eagles has just repeated it.
-
Nat replied to the topic Artillery bases in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
Dont forget that as far as the rules are concerned each crewman is considered to be on their own 25mm round base. This is important for working out templates, and distance between the crew and the gun (its meassured to the breach of the gun).
Having said that I play that if you hit the gun with a certain size template (3″) I just say you hit…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Napoleonic Skirmishers in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 2 months ago
Beat me to it, Garry!
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Napoleonic Skirmishers in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 2 months ago
You need to look at the rules for mixed formation for this aspect of line infantry play. The mixed formation section is part of the advanced rules. Technically the mixed formation is based on a third of the battalion being deployed as skirmishers, rather just the light/voltigeur company, so you may prefer to allow mixed formation for some of your…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Landwehr/Miliz and Mixed Formation in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 2 months ago
Whats the rule that stops the Landwher from deploying skirmishers?
- Load More