Activity
-
Big Al replied to the topic Basing Differences for Black Powder Napoleonics in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
Not so. All of my units are based for the ruleset In The Grand Manner, which just happens to be the same size as the bases included in the plastic boxes by Perry Miniatures. So my infantry units are 6 figures to a base and 6 bases of 45x40mm. That gives a frontage of 270mm. I often play against units of 6 bases on 40x40mm bases and a frontage of…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Large unit stats in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
The supplements are not great when it comes to things like this. They could be referring to reduced numbers in a unit on campaign after losses and desertions. It could just be a misprint or error by the author that was missed during proof reading.
Remember that the rules in the supplements are only suggestions, whereas the rules in the rulebook…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Stats and Costs in Black Powder, Napoleonic in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
You’ll have to give further references. Which book are these points in?
You see, there are no points in Black Powder! The game was designed for use with scenarios. A rudimentary points system was included in the appendices of the original version of Black Powder, but was omitted from V2.
The supplement books were written for the original r…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Stats and Costs in Black Powder, Napoleonic in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
Well
Clash of Eagles is the book about the French invasion of Russian 1812 where the Prussians where part of the French army….
the Hundred days is the waterloo campaign (Albion Triumphant vol2) the number in brackets is what the value should be if you calculate the cost of the unit from scratch.Horse Artillery
reg art
small (1/2 b…[Read more] -
Garry Wills replied to the topic Stats and Costs in Black Powder, Napoleonic in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
Hello Karl,
In Albion Triumphant 2, the units are given different guns, the British are given Smoothbore (16 points for shooting, p.106) and the Prussians are given Light Smoothbore (12 points for shooting, p.128). The Dutch (p.114) are the comparison you mention, as the RHA are given additional special rules.
Adkins ‘Waterloo Companion’ shows…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Stats and Costs in Black Powder, Napoleonic in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 1 month ago
Because the points are fudged…. if you use the points calcualator from v1 rulebook you find with standard artillery they come in at 30 points for the Prussians OR you use them as light guns (36″ range) and 26 points is right.
-
SteveT started the topic Price hikes too much in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
What does anyone else think? I think the price rises over the last 2 years make it impossible (for me) to consider ordering any more from Warlord. Will have to use resellers who offer the same products often at 20% lower albeit with a far more limited selection. Yet Warlord keep expanding their lines…so they are obviously doing better than the…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Bolt Action Vietnam? in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
It has been done, in great detail too, by a group called VC on The Trail : https://vconthetrail.wordpress.com/download/
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Torpedo – Minimum distance travel before armed in the forum Cruel Seas 3 years, 1 month ago
100 to 200 m are common in German Navy. The setting could be changed in most “Zündpistolen” / Fuzes. . Arming was done in most by the turning of the propeller at the tip. Others, like P 4 or DWK Fuze had a small water wheel in hull. That had a problem, early ones had not been secured against tube rubbing problems so the turning could st…[Read more]
-
Craig replied to the topic Does Warlord Games read our posts in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
Yes they do.
-
Craig replied to the topic Adventskalender Bolt Action in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
Thats a good idea. I will pass it on.
-
Craig replied to the topic 403 error when attempting to reply to a post in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
Forum indexes have been re-calculated, hopefully that should fix things.
-
Craig replied to the topic Gallery Section in the Forum? in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 1 month ago
No – still supported. 🙂
-
Nat replied to the topic Do intervening infantry give soft cover to armor? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
[quote]Infantry models are always allowed to see and shoot through enemy infantry and artillery models as if they were not there. Note however that if you shoot through an enemy unit, this will provide cover to their comrades behind, as explained later in the section about cover[/quote]
Basically its worked out from the firing model… if the LoF…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Do intervening infantry give soft cover to armor? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
One of many rules from original infantry game that now……. Sure, if you fire at an infantry unit another between you and target might inflict a problem.
But AT rounds against a tank? Hardly a problem to see and aim on it. And a human body against an AT round……
Even a lorry will not stop it. (OK , the motor block) In WW I a Germ…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Do intervening infantry give soft cover to armor? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
So the AT gun has a clear line of sight at a tank and declears a shot, suddenly theres a unit in front of it….. but that doesnt matter?
(as it happens I do tend to play it that the mods are worked out when you roll to hit, & I make sure my opponent is aware that I can jump the riders off to infront of the tank and so hinder the clear shot)
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 1 month ago
You’ve hit the biggest issue with WLPS & Carriers in my opionion after a number of discussions – the free flights (which is why all the community points systesm have a carrier discount)
Deep Deployment – after the FAQ has added about a page of extra rules, they’ve adminted that it doest work so ‘recommend you dont use it in tournaments’…. I…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Do intervening infantry give soft cover to armor? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
yes….
which is why the wording of tank riders & its lack of timings/clarity is a problem….. because they dismount when the shot is decleared and found to be in range, so even though they are down if they go infront of the tank the shot now passes over them…so do you work out the cover when declearing the shot or when rolling the dice (so…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 1 month ago
I’d cry…. my list would need a fair bit of luck with the FAN torpedo rolls… BUT as my list is a 1943 list the teeth are pulled from that USN list (corsairs arent carrier capable, DP is half dice & Alaska isnt a valid selection) so I’d give it a go…..
-
Nat replied to the topic Commonwealth National Characteristics question in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 1 month ago
You either choice an army from the ‘armies of’ book and gain the 3 special rules, of which 1 is the free FO, OR you choice the specific commonwealth list
eg Indian army from duel in the sun removes the 3 British army rules and ONLY has the two in the duel in the sun (pg 23)
- Load More