Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
Just some house rules for people to look at based for a competative pickup game…
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
https://warlord-community. warlordgames. com/resources-victory-at-sea/
remove the double spaces after the full stops.
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
@GregS – Dogfights happen at the end of the gunnery phase, so Bomber will always be able to attack a ship they are in B2B with before the fighters get a chance to shoot them down…. actually engaging bombers (of any type) that are touching a ship is the worst thing to do as it stops defensive AA from targeting them.
Gunnery phase is effectively…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
I will say there are some confussing answers in the FAQ… most of which are to do with points… (one of the reasons why there are a couple of alternative point systems over in the wardroom facebook group).
The FAQ also doesnt cover 100% of the stat related issues or rules interpretations (ie another being the returning ships diagram… is it…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
https://warlord-community. warlordgames. com/resources-victory-at-sea/
remove the double spaces after the full stops!
-
Nat replied to the topic A few rules questions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 4 months ago
All of these questions are in the offical FAQ (i’ll post a link in a min)
Kamikazes dont apply modifiers as per the FAQ… all flights hit on the flights chart EXCEPT FOR WHEN ATTACKING SUBS (for some STUPID reason!)
DP fires when the ship fires NOT when the AA batteries defensive fire at the start of the gunnery phase.
If you look in the ‘news…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Fortress Budapest Play Through in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 4 months ago
Keep ’em coming!
-
Nat replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
(Disclaimer – I dont have Epic ACW rules)
If the Whipped unit always tests at all damage taken then yeah its 2D6-3 Vthe chart. As you dont roll on the chart until you have reached your stamina level a reduced stamina means that your opponent has to do less shooting to cause it to take that first check.
The rule set isnt a tightly written one…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
In addition to Nat’s explanation, a unit can be ‘whipped’ by shooting without being shaken if it has the ‘wavering’ special rule. However this is the only case I can think of as ‘whipped’ units can’t be rallied.
-
Nat replied to the topic ACW Whipped units in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
Brigade Moral, if you lose more than 50% of a brigade its broken and retires from the battle. So if you have 3 units in your brigade and 1 is whipped, If/when one of the other 2 units os destroyed then you only have 1 unit left, which is less than the 50% threshold so the brigade retires (runs away)
A units stamina is how much punishment it c…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Brigade orders amd unreliable troops in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
Sounds good to me. The unreliable rule allows the exception.
-
Big Al replied to the topic Mixed formation skirmishers and moral saves in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
Yes, Garry, that is correct. It only gets the benefits of skirmishers when shot at to the front.
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Mixed formation skirmishers and moral saves in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
Sorry but I have to disagree, the rules specifically say that the -1 to hit as a skirmish target is applied. Nowhere in the rules does it say the mixed formations are treated as skirmish targets ‘in all respects’. If it was intended that the morale save did not apply we would hope that Rick would have said so. Obviously people can play this…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Brigade orders amd unreliable troops in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
The brigade order is rolled against the commander’s Staff rating, the result is then modified by any factors that might affect it. For example, if one member of the brigade is beyond the first 12 inches of the commander a -1 modifier is applied and so on.
the rule for brigade orders is that all units included in the order must be within 6 i…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Brigade orders amd unreliable troops in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
That is a great question. I think the brigade order rules must apply so that one other unit would have to move half a move to keep the brigade integrity.
Personally I play in 15mm and use a 12cm brigade integrity distance to allow more realistic deployments, so it would be less of an issue, but in the past I have just left the unreliable units…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Redoubt’s and fleches in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
I tend to consider them as linear obstacles and assume that the units are in line or skirmish. I think columns are inappropriate. Alternatively you could consider them as buildings in which case formation is not important. However I think to make them buildings is to make them unrealistically strong. Just my opinion though.
-
invisible officer started the topic Show us your fleets in the forum Cruel Seas 3 years, 4 months ago
The forum is a “bit” empty in the moment. Any forum lives from the members, so you should post.
Why not showing your ships? Or tell us about your plans.
My ship buliding is down in the moment, the international wood prices got crazy high.
And a lot of hardware got in the way. Includig a genuine SMS Emden I Sailors cap. I resarc…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese starting set in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 4 months ago
yes light mortars are worth it in a japanese army… they can split fire (pick a different target from the rest of the unit) + give smoke.
the Tank I build with a medium AT gun… however depends on how much armour you face in your local group as to what will do you best…
two additions… hmm.. I added a sniper / flamethrower blisters and the…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic German 37mm flak-zwilling in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 4 months ago
wg.easyarmy.com is a good list builder…not 100% accurate but it is one person looking after it when he gets the individual books…
I think that theres only a few obsucure units that arent in the generic reinforced platoon…..not being a german player I cant say yes or no for you question.
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Query regarding brigade composition – War of Spanish Succession in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 4 months ago
I don’t play that period but the thing that pops out to me is the artillery. My understanding is that the artillery can’t be moved once unlimbered, but needs an order to change front, so you may need them in separate brigades with a specific commander. Odd number of units per brigade is pretty conventional. Have you looked at historical OOBs?…[Read more]
- Load More