Activity
-
SteveT replied to the topic Flamethrowers and Buildings in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
We sure about this? I assumed the wording actually meant “Shot at” as “successfully shot at” as in “hit”.
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
@Mike, how do you get in contact with the vehicle except by assault? in game terms Assault is a type of Run Command that allows a model to by-pass the 1″ gap rule. So (Rules here) you cant get in contact with the vehicle unless you declear an assault.
So you now follow the assault rules, which include passangers bailing out in the way of th…[Read more]
-
Craig replied to the topic acw epic delivery in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 10 months ago
If you can send me a private message with your details (do not post on here) I can look into this for you.
-
Craig replied to the topic Epic pricing in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 10 months ago
They are epic. 😃
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Sourcing Miniatures in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 10 months ago
Hmm, there are some units that are often mixed in lists. In June 1758 the 81st Invalids became the 71st. Blue facings. Disbanded 1769. A new 71st war raised 1775 for AWI. Fraser’s with White Facings. Post 1777 rarely with kilt. The Highland units even dropped the OR sword. Disbanded 1783.
The number was not the name. So the lienag…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Sourcing Miniatures in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 10 months ago
As mentioned, we have the letters, the pipers did the standard piper job of frightening the enemy and the locals. Before 1854 pipers are not sanctioned, not even in kilted units. Paid by Colonel or the officers. And so some non Highland units had some, like the 20th that had one kia at Roncevalles
The officers disliked the Horseguard pol…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Sourcing Miniatures in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 10 months ago
They still had them, paid by the officers. Horse guard paid for drummers and buglers only. Fortunately we have letters from officers as source. Not just modern oics.
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
@MasterCheif – two key words there IF & Manages. The transport disembark in to combat means that you didnt get in to contact with the vehicle.
I disagree that the suicide AT rule should over ride the combat disembark rule, as that would mean the unit stays on board when every instict would be to jump out
-
Nat replied to the topic Bulgarian Counter-partisan Experts rule vs Forward Deployment in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
If their rule says it stops forward deployment then it’s stops all deployment using those rules.
About the outflank I’ll have to look at the rules again to say either way
-
Nat replied to the topic Discrepancies and possible errors in the rulebook in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
Hi Tobias
A long list of stat, point* and rules related problems has been submitted to Warlord (including most of what you’ve listed here) and we are waiting on the studio to release an FAQ /Errata.
However some of what appears to be stat typos is due to the stats having real world influences, such as ammunition (AP & DD) and fire control…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
suicide bombers can fight in close combat*, they just cant declare a charge against the unit.
However in this case its the embarked unit thats effectively counter-charging the bomber.
*they dont have the ‘unarmed’ rule… now they IIRC they can chose to use the AT mine as their weapon – aka remove both models :p or ‘boot knife’
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Sourcing Miniatures in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 10 months ago
Or a scratch bagpipe, giving the ears of the poor English a rest. Like I did. Something different.
Rocket cars, mine was more reycling than scratch.
-
Nat replied to the topic Points cost and odd stats in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
hi,
As IO pointed out the ship stats are taken from the realworld, which is why some guns of the same approx calibare have different AP and traits. The ships fire control systems and the Nations ammunition manufacturing affects the range of the weapons.
And yes the points across the book are messed up and make little sense…
However you then…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Sourcing Miniatures in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 10 months ago
Converting can be like a drug. Its fun and I love to have MY own miniatures. I converted a full HLI unit years ago.
Easier than converting the London born son of a w. into a Yorkshire one in a series of novels just beacause the actor ………….
Well, that character is so full of fuss that that change in later written books makes no d…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic West German Farm Board. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
For a typical German Farm of WW II time you should not add a silo. Silage was common in UK and Scandinavia but most German Farmers still used hay only. A farm in Western Germany sounds like Northwest to me. Mostly smaller ones with some animal raising too. A fruit garden would be typical too, apple trees and some cherry ones.
The Farmer of…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Continued delay of Regia Marina models! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
There are problems in real world that cause delays for most gaming companies. . Corona and Brexit for example. But also longtime problems with mould makers. Much demand, few makers in UK.
Not everything is done “In house” by warlord. Even something simple like packing material can cause a long delay now.
If just one item comes from abroad…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Points cost and odd stats in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
I GUESS because the real world German 15 cm had more “Bumms” than the 6 “. The mv was bigger in most German 15 cm than in contemporary 6”. Esp. the SKC / 25 was superior. On the other side the projectile weight was higher in MK XXIII 6″, but similar in XXII.
For a game designer its ever difficult to design a working formula and keep close to…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Moving artillery onto the table in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 10 months ago
Nat is right following the rules.
But there is no reason to get the game close to real world among gentle men. For example the 88 was sometimes moved for short distances without motor. So in 1940 against French bunkers. With a few rounds on the Sonderanhänger. Slow, hard work. Under fire…….
On other side manhandling a medium gun, hmm…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Continued delay of Regia Marina models! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
hmmm…..
It looks / sounds like its all hands to the pump to hit the promise of getting the BP Epic ACW out at the end of the month…..
-
Nat replied to the topic Light Guns/AA in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 10 months ago
1) light guns using DP are light guns that are able to shoot flights, they by pass Tough & Very Tough but are used during the ships activation -this has been confirmed by the Author on Social Media, if you check out the ‘news from the wardroom!’ thread I’ve put up a flights 101 guide which has all the references of how they work. There is also a…[Read more]
- Load More