Activity
-
SteveT replied to the topic Japanese native irregulars in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
OK, so you can get these from Warlord:
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese native irregulars in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
@SteveT – yes, they are in Flames of Empire Book
@Nick – As per the FAQ they dont get any army special rules….how ever you can get the Austrailian /British Native Irregulars, or get the Japanese Spearmen and remove the spears replacing them with rifles.
They would be the people of the ‘greater east asia co-prosperity sphere’ who belived the…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Japanese native irregulars in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
You are definitely talking about Bolt Action, not Samurais, right?
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Thanks to a Wardroom member for writing this up!
This one way of doing approximately balance points lists from the two player set. No refits are taken on any ship.
IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY
Medium Priority. Total Points: 710
2x Mogami-Class Heavy Cruisers
3x Fubuki-Class Destroyers
High Priority. Total Points: 785
2x Mogami-Class Heavy…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Are there rules for Sikhs? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
Is it duel in the sun? or the other western desert book?
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft AP? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Its in the flights stats section of each nations arsenal.
level bomber (ie the B17) have the heavy trait – this is a possible critical on a natural 5 or 6.
Dive bombers & torpedo bombers have the devastating trait – this means they ignore the ships armour and do hull damage (only armoured deck or torpedo belt can modifiy it) and do possibly a…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic French Forces of the Interior in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
“Use” is the problem. The old FRench tanks had only that one true action mentioned by me. True Resistance units had no tank actions, only the semi regular 13th Dragons p. formed post D Day .
The resistance got many German armored vehicles but only used them for demonstrations against rearguards. Like the French ones. No true fights. To use…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic French Forces of the Interior in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
The post D-day local raised French got a lot of German equipment. Including 12 Panther tanks in good condition.
Two stood long before the Musee de L’armee Invalide dome on exibition. With French markings.
(Polish had “Pudel”, a Panther and used in in Warsaw rising)
Some 44 Panzer, incl. a tiger, are used. Main Tank force came from…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Spotters and preliminary bombardment/artillery barrage in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago
They are a seperate unit that share an order dice.
However the order dice is rem0ved if the mortar /howitzer is. So for Prelim bombardments, yes they are treated as two different units.
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
dont worry about it, its how we learn, I’ve learnt as much by writing these guides as by reading the rules.
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Hi Peter,
Re movement – all ships have to move at least 1″ unless the condition is one of the 3 i mentioned. They are not able to turn unless they’ve moved 1″with agile or 2″ normally with lumbering (limited to 1 turn per move)
Re Orders – yes they’re supposed to be in the ship activation irrespective of the order. I’ll have to correct that i…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Torpedo Rules in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Love how someone has looked at the rules and gone useless here yet in the wardroom people are going they need nerfing as they are too deadly!
😝
-
Nat replied to the topic Scouting and Radar in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
As I said it’s slightly easier to understand as you realise how the books been assembled .. not that it was expanded clearer..
-
invisible officer replied to the topic What Am I Missing? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
If you decide to play in 1944, then these planes just get way better for no extra points? It may be historically accurate, but doesn’t seem balanced on a tabletop. What am I missing?
Simple answer: Nothing. But how many ballanced carrier fights had been there in 44/45? As often two worlds collide, the pure wargamer that wants equal ch…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Torpedo Rules in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Shrakins and Nat are 100 % right.
The chances are roughly based on real world ones or even better.
Take for example 3. Schnellboot Flottille in med. from 9/40 to 1/45.
184 Torpedoes fired at warships 22 hits 1 hit in 8,3 fired With a D6 ………
53 at merchant ships 13 hits
11 at stationary ships 3 hits ! ( Hitting sandbar…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
v.1 of the Cheat Sheet (2 page) and shooting modifiers (also 2 page)
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
So heres the Flights 101, pretty much everything you need for flights, pending the FAQ….
-
Nat started the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
So I thought I’d start this thread so I can post up player guides and stuff that I’m (and others) are writing up on the Facebook group the Wardroom.
I’ll start with a generic bit of new – a couple of members are updating the Battlescribe data files, they have done 99% of the IJN, the points of the RN & RM.. others are being worked out so expect…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic What Am I Missing? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
@Shrokins, thats hit on 5+s when touching base with the target ship only, otherwise they are hit on 6s.
-
Nat replied to the topic Scouting and Radar in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago
Would have been better if it was, I agree.
Its (slighty) easier to understand in the full rulebook, because the core is the same as the 2 player book, then submarines are another section, mtbs another, weather & night a 3rd. They dont go over past rules but are written as additions…..
Theres a reason why I’ve done a 2 page cheat guide to the…[Read more]
- Load More