George

Activity

  • Nat replied to the topic Why the Etna? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago

    In the facebook group one of the authors has confirmed that they’ve put the un commissioned vessals in to the game for both game balance & to enable what-ifs

  • Nat replied to the topic Heavy Cavalry D1 in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 8 months ago

    all dragoons in the game are heavy Cav D1, as are dutch belgium carabiners (AT2), Neopliatian Heavy cav (CoE) and Spanish guard Heavy Cav (AT1)

  • Big Al replied to the topic Heavy Cavalry D1 in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 8 months ago

    Yes and so are British heavy dragoon’s, which seems a bit odd, really.

  • Nat replied to the topic Heavy Cavalry D1 in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 8 months ago

    yes…. and saxon heavy cav are D2 or D3 (roll per unit at start of game)

  • thats a mix of v1 and v2 rules…

    in v1 Div Comanders could use their SR to order any unit …

    in v2 Div Commanders just provide a single reroll per turn to 1 bde commander that they have joined (so start the turn in 12″ /proximity of)

    however v2 also gives you the option of changing your div commanders re-roll to a different skill (IIRC theres…[Read more]

  • Big Al, it looks like Richard is using BP first edition in which the French were given the Reliable special rule when in attack column. Like you, I prefer to play without the additional +1. Playing with points as Richard is, there ought to be a points cost for this but it was free in BP1.

    Richard, the average benefit of the extra +1 staff rating…[Read more]

  • Pas de Charge is 2 points per unit, and gives you in effect a limited version of reliable, in it only works if the unit is in assault column, now thats where the issue comes in – as some of the supplements say pas de charge is reliable in assault column, which is the same wording as the BPv2 rule book.   However as you pay points for it we (…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Why the Etna? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago

    my view with the Italian set up including the Aquila is the aircraft and special rules… the Italians have a rule that if you take ground based aircraft you suffer a -1 to your initiative roll so required a carrier, that then comes with a rule for aircraft with folding wings…. and only the Re2001s being carrier capable.

    Now the Etna…I guess…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Proof reading in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago

    Currently there is no erata… as already mentioned the rulebook hasnt been released (due end of Jan) so all we have is a Quick Start Rule booklet….

    There has been feed back to warlord about typos in the cards, but the cards will just be player aids and (hopefully) over ruled by the mainbook

     

  • Nat replied to the topic Blank Stat Cards in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 8 months ago

    I’d say no official ones…. however when we get the rulebook in january you’ll be able to make up your own…

    I expect to see a few mockups here or on the facebook group (Victory at sea Wardroom (unoffical))

  • Most people I know don’t use points. However, it is up to you. If you want to reduce the command level of your Commanders, you do it. The general thing with command ratings is not to go below 5 or above 9 (except for certain generals like Wellington or Napoleon).

    Secondly, the Attack Column only gives a +1 to the command roll, not +2 unless the c…[Read more]

  • To grow the non profit making service staff sounds nice, from asking  customer’s view. But someone has to pay for it.”Free” is not really free. We all pay for it.

     

    The profit rate in books is not high.

    In a good organised depot collecting the stuff is fast. Selecting / Building a box are seconds. (I did so decades ago in a company mail…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic 1809 French Allies in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 8 months ago

    Yes, if you are taking a Wurttemburg division you need at least 1 Inf Bde… however Black Powder is best described as a framework rules… as they are allies I would allow you to add just the light infantry brigade with no Wurttemburg divisional commander but not allow them to benefit from the divisional commanders re-roll

    Re Artillery.. yes,…[Read more]

  • doesnt matter if you’re a vet of a dozen battles or just out of training…. if you trying to put a handgrenade through a slit!  The difference is your getting there (the order check)

  • Nat replied to the topic NCO as loaders in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago

    wouldnt be the first FAQ answer that directly contradicts the rulebook…. look at the rece movement entries…. I’d take that answer as being for that unit only at best or ignore it totally at worse.

    Having said that, if your gaming group is happy for your NCOs to be loaders then go for it… double penalty when the NCO is killed off by…[Read more]

  • SteveT replied to the topic NCO as loaders in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago

    Mmmm: is that specific to that unit I wonder,

  • SteveT replied to the topic NCO as loaders in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago

    Thank you, a very rapid response!

  • Bunch of 10 green troops manage to pass a test to assault an enemy tank.

    Bunch of 10 veteran grenadiers manage to pass a test to assault an enemy tank.

    According to the rules, apart from the fact the vets would be more likely to pass an order test,   both are equally effective at the actual attack on the tank?

    Hmmm…

     

  • Reasonably sure I am doing this right but …

    A vehicle that has not been given no order this turn is assaulted by infantry who are under 6″ away. It cannot shoot in defence.  Does a vehicle with Recce have the same restriction? I think so.  The question arose as the recce vehicle was backed onto the table edge and had nowhere to run,

     

  • SteveT started the topic NCO as loaders in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 8 months ago

    What do you all think? Could a squad’s NCO double up as a loader for a support weapon that is part of the squad?

     

    (Question arose when making SNLF Grenadiers. Wanted a compact 3 mortar group which needs 6 men of course, but would. it need a 7th for the NCO or could he just be a loader.)

    Cheers

     

  • Load More