Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Are Rifle Grenades a small arm or heavy weapon? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 11 months ago
There is no problem… it actually came out of another discussion about small arms with a PEN value (while we agree that they cant get a positive PEN… in theory I suppose you could have a negative PEN value on small arms… but that would be a v2 for impovised weaponary….like a baseball bat or cricket ball :p) and if you could get a heavy…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Wardroom (facebook group) FAQ in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 11 months ago
<swaring> conflicting ‘confirmations’ oh how stuff works depending on when, where & who you ask!
:@
-
Nat replied to the topic How does AA fire against Flights and Flight attacks on Ships ACTUALLY work? in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 11 months ago
Hi Chrisitian, if you look in the thread wardroom FAQ, i’ve done a complete breakedown of how AA works in the FAQ thats attached.
In the QSR for aircraft attacking ships, they hit on their own score, no modifiers (only kamikazes say to use them, the others say not to) and evade will still take effect as its any successful attack.
-
SteveT started the topic Exceptional HE damage in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 11 months ago
If exceptional damage is scored whilst rolling within a HE template….. must the casualty be taken from a man within that template?
How about normal hits? Could they be taken from outside the template?
Seems odd if “yes”
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Smoke and aircraft – Like to hear your opinions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 11 months ago
There is the usual gap between history and simple game rules.
Can aircraft attack a ship prorected by a smokescreen? Surely not if the ship is not moving like Tirpitz in Norway. Smoke dischargers at the coast and on pontoons produced a Screen that made the RN and RAF attackers blind.
A moving ship will not be in such a thick screen. S…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Battalion Squares and Attack Columns in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 11 months ago
I would recommend the Last Argument of Kings supplement (£7.50 for the pdf). It amends the rules for the 18th Century battles in several interesting ways. As has been said it removes the attack column and also modifies how march columns deploy.…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Competitive Ships in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 11 months ago
@clockwork, are you on Facebook? If so the wardroom has a document with the commonally used in naval war games abbreviations – although most are NATO to be honest :p
-
Nat replied to the topic Smoke and aircraft – Like to hear your opinions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 11 months ago
I don’t think this has come up much…if at all
now the diagrams show smoke from the base…but the rules indicate that it should be the bridge – good question will ask the wardroom!
aircraft attacking ships in smoke, I’m tempted to say no they can’t because they wouldn’t be able to see the ships to attack…however I don’t thin the QSR says…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Are Rifle Grenades a small arm or heavy weapon? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
The Rifle Grenade is fired by a small arm but can hardly be classed as a typical small arm amo. Explosive load in HE was normally much less than in a Hand grenade but enough to produce a lot of splinters.
And there also existed hollow charge rounds. Intended against armored vehicles.
So historically a rifle grenade could hurt armored ve…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic The 1 inch rule in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
Our club keeps a gap between infantry and other infantry so you can tell squads / teams apart… but yeah we dont bother with the 1″ between vehicles and infantry
-
Nat replied to the topic Are Rifle Grenades a small arm or heavy weapon? in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
I dont have battle for france or battle of the bulge.. the 2 campaign books I have dont classify RGA as either small are OR Heavy weapon…
-
Nat replied to the topic Observation flights, spotter questions in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 12 months ago
yes you pick which use your aircraft have before deployment.. so 2 scouts & 2 spotting.
During deployment, after scouting points have been spent you assign a spotter plan to an enemy ship. The spotter stays with that ship for the duration of the game or the assigned ship is sunk.* This then enables you to select that ship as a target for Over H…[Read more]
-
SteveT started the topic Afrika Korps Sd Kfz 233 armoured car in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
The Western Desert shows a painted “Afrika Korps Sd Kfz 233 armoured car”. Yet I cannot find it on any of the Theatre selectors in the book…
-
SteveT started the topic The 1 inch rule in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
I understand that any two friendly units cannot be closer than 1 inch to each other.
I can see why it was done to avoid confusing piles of figures. But do any of you ignore this rule, especially for when a commander is running alongside another group?
On a similar note, the already–much-discussed rule of 1 unit per building (floor) seems odd…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Rules Reference Sheet in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 12 months ago
I’m waiting till feb…so I’ve got the full rulebook in my hands and had a read through it (or 3!) before doing any quick refs or spreadsheets..
BattleScribe has the released ships in it…(it’s a bit convoluted to get the stats to print…select a ship, select a name then a refit year)
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Motorcycle Squads in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 12 months ago
With DAK Motorbicycle units are a must. And naturally no German horse there, not like in Europe. There more cavalry served than Kradschützen.
In fact the heavy German BMW and Zündap are great, even 2020 – On streets. Pure fun to drive, or in sidecar. But even in European countryside not nice to move away from street. In Africa’s dunes it was…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Skirmishers supporting a charge. in the forum Hail Caesar 3 years, 12 months ago
Right, the it would all depend on your order and how you worded it. You should issue a “brigade” order to include both units, something like “this warband and skirmishers will charge the enemy warband.”
as you know, skirmishers cannot charge formed infantry, but the term “charge” does not mean that a unit must make contact. If it is not allowed…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 12 months ago
@Cameron – hi there… you might want to have a look at the campaign book ‘Germany strikes’ it was (like a lot of them) written for v1 of Bolt Action but does contain a Danish army list…..
-
Nat replied to the topic A comparison in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 12 months ago
I’m hoping for just about every card they’ve already released to be corrected with the rules in the main rule book…..
or at least give us the points to ‘refit’ the destroyers in to carrying depth charges…. (and look, we’re back to asking about proof reading! :p)
-
Nat replied to the topic Deep Deployment in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 12 months ago
sorry thought I had 🙁 … I’ve now uploaded v1.2
- Load More