Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic cost of Spanish Guerrillas? in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 1 month ago
Irregular = -5
weapons = no cost
H2H = 4
Shooting = 4
Morale = 12 (3 points, count down from 6)
Stamina = 8
Marauder = 5Total cost is 28 points a SMALL unit
to go to a normal /standard size then add +8 points
to go to a large add +8 (or +16 from a small unit)
to go to a tiny its -12 (the cost of becoming a tiny unit is flexiable) -
Nat replied to the topic DoW List CoE in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 1 month ago
The Brigade number restrictions are per 1K, the cavalry regiments are per army no matter the points value.
So a 3K list you can have 3 Cavalary brigades and therefore up to 6 cavalry regiments – however only 1 can be hussars, up to 3 chassaers so the last 2 HAVE to be Uhlans.
-
Nat replied to the topic cost of Spanish Guerrillas? in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 1 month ago
Doesn’t surprise me…there’s points and stat inconsistencies in several armies across the 3 Napoleonic supplements
However the points are very easy to work out…if it’s not been answered (and I remember) I’ll work it out for you tomorrow
-
Nat replied to the topic Defeating the Japanese? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 1 month ago
Can spearman attack a tank.
Yes, if they banzai they auto pass their tank fear check… however once they get there, can they hurt it?…
They need to hit (1 dice each..and if you moved* they need 6s, otherwise 4s – unless you run then it’s impossible to hit) each hit is +1 pen but limited to a single superficial hit on the tank at best…and…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Defeating the Japanese? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 1 month ago
following up from @Nanashi’s points
Mess his plans up…..
Cheep forward deploying units to run behind his spearmen – the Banzai rule says towards the closest visable unit (yes that includes the tank that they cant hurt & inexperienced artillery spotters :p) & spearmen have a 360 arc of sight. So if he wants them to move forward he needs to…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Austrian Abteilung Rule in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 2 months ago
CoE page 71 2nd paragraph under the Cavalry heading…. … it allows you to split any unit with that rule to smaller units.
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese Banzai from a Transport in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
Key point here….units must be on the board to be able to draw LoS, if you arent able to draw LoS at the start of the order you arent able to declear an assault – same reason as why you cant assault from outflank or reserves…
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew unit: Volksturm Panzerfaust Squad in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
@Nanashi – one shot (or limited number of shot) weapons dont have to be used when a unit fires, nor do they have to fire at the same target….
From the ONE SHOT rules. (sorry cant give a pg ref)
“If a unit of infantry includes a proportion of men armed with one-shot weapons, then each of these models is allowed to direct its fire against a…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Any recommendations for free STLs to make 28mm scale bicycle "tokens"? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
look for S gauge /s-scale model railway bicyle STL /models….
-
Nat replied to the topic Non-transport vehicles with transport? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
Cavalry – (FAQ allows you to upgrade the officer to have a horse if you have a couple of squads on horses)
motorbikes –bicycles – this isnt clear if they need a transport… but most people will allow it!
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
1) yep, all vehicle mounted MGs need looking at… espically the quad maxim!
2) not sure on this as they’re not really used that much any way…. are they?
3) removes about the only reason to take an inexperiance one :p
4)agree
5)agree
6)give models in a squad a 4+ bounce? (ie on a 4+ you get to ignore the exceptional and pick as normal) along…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
Senior Officers – If you could take them instead of a junior officer as opposed to in addition you’d see more of them… as it is they are surpless to requirements in most games
AT Grenades – The ‘issue’ is the hitting of tanks… I’ve used them a fair bit… more against open topped vehicles though… so prehaps the lowering of points (down to 1…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 3 months ago
RE: light AT & Light howitzers – instead of making them better you decrease the avaliblity of the heavier tanks…and /or split the war into early mid & late so their cost makes them more attractive.
Alter HE to a flat +1 PEN v Infantry except if under the centre of the template
RE AA: again I’d look at either RoF or making airstrikes more of…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic New Supplement on the Waterloo Campaign. Really? Why? in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 3 months ago
The ‘new’ waterloo suplement is geared for the EPIC system they have released as opposed to the tired old BP v1 Ablion Triumphant book 2
However I too would like a new BP supplement focused on Austerlitz etc…. but ( I blame the lack of clarity and bredth in British school history lessons) UK companies all seem obsessed with 2 or 3 battles…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Line of Battle in the forum Black Seas 2 years, 4 months ago
Core rulebook – pg 35
“Sailing in Lines”basically they are all bow to wave marker & activate when the slowest /last ship would with the ship at the head of the line going first… if they dont end the turn touching the wave marker then they arent in line next turn so activate normally.
-
Nat replied to the topic Are there any non-open top 7+/8+ vehicle with a Medium Howitzer besides BT-42? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
With a medium howitzer… not that I can think of…. closest I can think of is
SU76i – soviet book pg 51, DV 8+, light howitzer / med AT
-
Nat replied to the topic Russian Regiments: 2 or 3 stands? in the forum Black Powder 2 years, 4 months ago
Russian regiments arent any bigger, they just have a higher stamina to represent the hardyness and stoic nature of the Russian peasantry
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
And there (germanys lack of hardward, US excesses of hardware) you have the difference between pickup game & simulation :p
Limited number of equipment is NO reason not to put it in the list (how many vehicles already in the game were limited… a lot :p)…. and as for flamethrowers, I’d put one in – if someone invaded Sweden they’d pretty soon…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Homebrew: Sweden national rules and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
<argh… forum ate my reply>
So short version – SA80, I’m going off the armourers and not reports!… The Bren, that is just what Ive read, so if its wrong fair enough…
Ranges of engagement are only part of what generates the rules, in v1 LMGs had 6″ less range and 1 less shot but got buffed to V2 because they werent being used… so at 6″…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic What do YOU want to see in Bolt Action v3? in the forum Bolt Action 2 years, 4 months ago
@generaljimbo81 – I’d have said thats covered by the TLs having extra slots
- Load More