Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 1 day ago
Well the new generic platoon structure (outside of FAOs) is more historical. Now one size fits all doesnt work but most of the time /for most nations this works
MMGs & HMGs were in a weapons platoon along with the heavier mortars, only the LMGs and light mortars were in platoons. Tanks and artillery were not attached singularly to infantry b…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Well WL are doing a Tournament recommendations …. but you’ll find that the TO will decide once they have the rules in their hands… they may bin the official platoons and say use the v2 ones <shrugs> who knows
-
Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Ok warlords FB account has confirmed that it’s 1 rifle Platoon unlocks 1 each of the other 5 at the same time
-
Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 2 days ago
[Quote]
one other restriction – you can only have as many multiples of any Platoon type as you have Rifle Platoons. For example, if you want to field two Armoured Platoons, you’ll need two Rifle Platoons, and so on. Other than that – the choice is yours! [/quote]now without the writen rules – this is just Marcus’ chat about it… it reads that i…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3 NEW platoon composition! Edit: and discussion apparently in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 2 days ago
well this is only part of the equation… the rest is still in the dark!
we dont know what rules are changing
we dont know HOW the costs are changing
we dont know how unit composition is changing … it could be that compulsory choices must be taken at full strength.
etc etcall in all it looks like a good change for gaming groups. The…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Need help making my first bolt action army in the forum Bolt Action 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Mmgs/ hmg change – confirmed – screen shot of vehicle card from the starter set
Green rule – change confirmed – screen shot of a page of the rules and in the rulebook order page.
Engineers rule – this is from one of the campaign books
List building changes… sounds like it’ll be discussed this week in the v3 article… from talking to WL…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic How do you guys find tournaments? in the forum Bolt Action 3 weeks ago
Do you have discord?
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese torpedoes stupidly OP? Discussion welcome. in the forum Victory At Sea 3 weeks ago
It’s part of the long lance national rule…
There’s a house rule that goes if the bases are touching (or a few mm shy) you count as being in short range unless your weapon would be point blank…. So touching doesn’t mean your turret can hit that DD, but does mean your torp stands a chance of working
-
Nat replied to the topic How do you guys find tournaments? in the forum Bolt Action 3 weeks, 1 day ago
facebook – a lot of US regions have their own FB group – & word of mouth / hosted by LGS or gaming groups.
So all I can say is if you get your stuff from a game store ask in there.
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 weeks, 1 day ago
As an aside, a community member on FB /Discord is writing whats hoped to be an offical supplement for VaS – Here is his post from the Wardroom.
<quote>
last year I began the process of proposing to Warlord that I write an official expansion to Victory at Sea. A few months ago I got the green light to go ahead and start working on the first…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese torpedoes stupidly OP? Discussion welcome. in the forum Victory At Sea 3 weeks, 1 day ago
the missions all have a priority which gives you an extra 10% points, the agreed points or loses you 10% points…. for competative gaminng priority levels are normally ignored.
Erm… points…. yeah…. with the rulebook points I can take 3 different IJN Destroyers (DDs in short) all for the same 60 points and get 3 completely different type of…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Japanese torpedoes stupidly OP? Discussion welcome. in the forum Victory At Sea 3 weeks, 2 days ago
side note … do look in the ‘news from the wardroom’ as it was worked out that the starter set is NOT designed to have all the ships on the table at the same time. But rather give you the ships to do the 3 levels of priority as fleet can have (pg 21 in the starter booklet)
-
Nat replied to the topic Bolt action British Airborne army list in the forum Bolt Action 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Next, I’d never take 2 bodyguards on a HQ unit. This is because you go above a 2 man unit and no longer gain the -1 to hit modifier which is one of the biggest defenses of a unit.
secondly I’d take a bodyguard with the FAO, because the extra wound is always useful. Out of preferance I’d give him a rifle because you want him hanging back as h…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Bolt action British Airborne army list in the forum Bolt Action 4 weeks, 1 day ago
nit pick – which IS important for rules / list questions… thats a MEDIUM AT gun you have in your list, the 6 pdr QF gun, not a light AT gun.
The difference is a point of PEN (which matters for trying to damage tanks, especially at range) and 12″ of range
-
Nat replied to the topic Hand-to-hand partial contact in the forum Black Powder 1 month ago
So a few key points of BP v2 CORE rules (so not the epic versions which may be different)
1) Only a single unit (with a some exceptions for small unit / artillery) can fight on a facing
2) Units either fight or dont, the number of die they use is modified by formation, commanders, die split between multiple enemies etc not by ratio in contact. …[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Civil War Sailors in the forum Black Powder 1 month ago
hmm…. so quick look at what they looked like
So I’d say at 28mm (even more likely 15mm) you could get away with looking at British / European Naval 1850s models
However I’m running into a similar roadblock (not helped by works firewalls!) on finding actual manufactures – will keep looking!
-
Nat replied to the topic Forward Air Observers for the US in the forum Bolt Action 1 month ago
my (soviet) Air Observer is one of the BRS 28mm Ace pilots they did (Johnny Red)… so he can always double up as a ViP / downed pilot if the scenario requires one as I cant actually recall the last time I run him as an air observer….
mind you I think I’ve only run an artillery one once or twice in the last 18 months….
-
Nat replied to the topic Scenario 11: Surrounded! first turn query in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 1 week ago
IIRC – yes, thats the whole point of surrounded… the enemy can (and do) come from any direction!
-
Nat replied to the topic Forward Air Observers for the US in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 1 week ago
it has the potential for great comedy … epically if you have a lot of flack and shoot down your own aircraft! :p
Its one of those rules that can greatly vary between games from really bad (have 2 friendly airstrikes) to absolutely evil (2 airstrikes that neutralise the whole enemy force) and pretty much everything inbetween.
It also has the…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Indirect Fire Minimum Distance in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 1 week ago
No that fails because a spotter only provides Line of Sight EVERYTHING else which includes range is taken from firing unit
- Load More