Nat

Activity

  • Nat replied to the topic Soviet Lend Lease tanks in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 2 weeks ago

    Lend-Lease stuff is probably going to wait till next October with the armies of book 🙁

    till then I’d use a British armoured pltn as a lend-lease armd pltn to add the Shermans & Churchills.  (British shermans can workout about 5pts more expensive than the US ones..)

    (I’ve already got my local clubs agreement to do that with my lend-lease shermans)

  • Nat replied to the topic Missing Parts in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 2 weeks ago

    WL have a very good customer service dept… best off emailing them even if you dont require the part so that they’re aware

    also include the name on the packing slip (if you still have it) & where you got it from incase its a batch issue rather than just misfortune that you and your mate had the same thing missing.

    As a side note I had a scout…[Read more]

  • IIRC the gentelmans war gives a nice rounded v2 list… so i’d go with that and then see what you need (if anything) to add to make a legal v3 list.

    OR you can wait till the end of January and get hold of the new armies of Germany book which could change your mind with what you want to build.

  • You cant give units inside a transport a Fire! order, only Down, Advance or Run.

    So no they cant call in their attack..

  • Mike, two things,

    1) most game systems keep points cost calculations in-house to stop people creating their own units that can then break the systems.  We can extrapulate a number of the costs but with tanks you have roundings and (hopefully) proportional costs.  To put a build your own tank program out is bad for buisness.
    2) what we have in B…[Read more]

  • the v3 get-you-by lists are copy and pastes with minor CORE rule changes from the armies of books … historical unit changes werent updated – even those that have been in the v2 FAQ for YEARS!

    The campaign book corrections likewise havent been factored in to the get-you-by lists…

    We currently dont have any dates for when the minor nations…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Version 3, first games in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 3 weeks ago

    2.  … what about FAOs?  still allowing them to spot for any non-inexpeirenced indirect weapon?

  • Nat replied to the topic Buildings in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 3 weeks ago

    Barrage or any indirect that hits a building /unit in a building then tests to see which floor it explodes on!  – You can either target empty building OR units within building, but you cant target buildings that have units inside. (gameplay reasons)

    From v2 (cant recall if majorly different in v3) any level where you could stand /place models is…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Buildings in the forum Bolt Action 1 month, 3 weeks ago

    So buildings… in real life are great hiding places… right up until spotters then they become death traps when targeted by artillery.

  • oh I fully agree that WL could and SHOULD have read through their own v2 FAQ and made sure that every point was covered in the rules…. but they didnt so the v3 FAQ is going to be longer than that of v2 🙁

    there was a couple of spotter vehicles in the later campaign books…

    My point was that spotters are only 10 points each and not locked to…[Read more]

  • I’d say no, they’re not HQ units so why would they get the explict HQ allowance for seeing /working out of transports…. plus their 10 points each with multiple buffs from v2.

  • (dont worry I know what you mean …. I have a 3rd Ed metal sisters army….)

    v3 was needed because of the size of the FAQ… but seen as the army books (less germany) were all v1 and the v2 rulebook lasted 12 years!

  • Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 2 months ago

    So Easy Army is NOT official… it used to be, but hasn’t been for the last couple of years.  The official army builder is the Warlord App (found on google & apple play stores) that is behind a paywall.  Easy Army is currently upto date on the major armies for v3 but the one guy who runs it is still working on updating the minor nations.

    What w…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 2 months ago

    problems – after 5 seconds of thinking….
    1) movement, you cant move within 1″ of  another unit including friendly… so you need a 3-4″ path.. oh and you have to go round terrain, but how can you do that AND stay 1″ away from your other unit?
    2) Ambush & reactions – the how and when – as if doing it sequenctially i’d get a clear shot off but…[Read more]

  • correct.

    Because Ambush changes to a Fire! order when activated not an Advance.

  • Nat replied to the topic Indirect Fire Question in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 1 week ago

    So this is the same as v2 (both wording and how it works)

    When you target a unit, it has a footprint area.  In order to have moved far enough away from that area no model can be within 2″ of it after its move.

    Now this means most vehicles will have advance forwards as a reverse of 4.5″ wont be enough for the front to be 2″ further back than the…[Read more]

  • Yep its a trailer… but as its a trailer its not a vehicle (cant move on its own) so its under the artillery section.

    its classified as a heavy gun for moving (so cant be man handled 6″ on a run order)

     

  • Its upto 5 in a platoon

    Its a heavy gun so can only move with a TOW

    Its artillery so is 4 guys who are wounder as per their expeirance level…

  • Nat replied to the topic FAO and spotters V3 in the forum Bolt Action 2 months, 2 weeks ago

    Yes – its a massive change.

    Basically if its firing indirect and not inexperience or a multi-launcher then it can draw LoS for ANY/ALL spotters or Observers (no distinction between air or artillery).  You need to loose LoS from ALL possible spotters (or just receive an order by any means other than FIRE!) to reset the range in score.

  • Nat replied to the topic Konflikt 2.0? in the forum Konflikt '47 2 months, 2 weeks ago

    We apparently should here something in mid December (adepticon)!

    There’s been a few articles about industry names joining the K47 writing team over the last few months (3 or 4 IIRC).

  • Load More