Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic SPQR 2.0 ? in the forum SPQR 3 years, 5 months ago
So the new rulebook has started shipping! (got my shipping confirmation yesterday),
-
Nat replied to the topic Is there part of a rule missing in shieldwall supplement in the forum Hail Caesar 3 years, 5 months ago
Oh so background mixed in the rules paraghraphs again…..
-
Nat replied to the topic Questions from After My First Test Battle in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
Just to add
4) building are hard to bring down with canon balls… not the sort of thing that could be done in a short space of time (even a couple of hours). Look at some of the building still standing that where under fire during that time period.
Also buildings are abstract, its very hard to find a single building big enough for 700+ men to f…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic Wars – Getting Started in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
Yes there are no points in the rule book, however points and stats are still in the supplements
-
Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic Wars – Getting Started in the forum Black Powder 3 years, 5 months ago
Hi Nigel,
re frontage yes in line they would have the same frontage, ie small unit of 8 models of Cav take up the same foot print at 16 infantry. when in line.
For whats easier, depends who you are planning on playing. As IO said, ask potential opponents, you may be able to combine orders and get cheaper delivery OR they already have a force…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Ships Used as Scouts in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
A) target is to get 5 or more… so a 4 will give you the scouting point. So if you get 1-3 re-roll the dice… if you get 1-3 again hard luck no SP for that ship.
B &C)A ship is scouting, so not available for the start of the battle, irrespective of if it gives you a scouting point or not. The only way to return it to your fleet is with e…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
So just a general update here. The studio team are defiantly looking at the questions I’ve submitted so i’m guessing /hoping we’ll have an FAQ /Errata in a couple of weeks.
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
@Mike, how do you get in contact with the vehicle except by assault? in game terms Assault is a type of Run Command that allows a model to by-pass the 1″ gap rule. So (Rules here) you cant get in contact with the vehicle unless you declear an assault.
So you now follow the assault rules, which include passangers bailing out in the way of th…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
@MasterCheif – two key words there IF & Manages. The transport disembark in to combat means that you didnt get in to contact with the vehicle.
I disagree that the suicide AT rule should over ride the combat disembark rule, as that would mean the unit stays on board when every instict would be to jump out
-
Nat replied to the topic Bulgarian Counter-partisan Experts rule vs Forward Deployment in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
If their rule says it stops forward deployment then it’s stops all deployment using those rules.
About the outflank I’ll have to look at the rules again to say either way
-
Nat replied to the topic Discrepancies and possible errors in the rulebook in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
Hi Tobias
A long list of stat, point* and rules related problems has been submitted to Warlord (including most of what you’ve listed here) and we are waiting on the studio to release an FAQ /Errata.
However some of what appears to be stat typos is due to the stats having real world influences, such as ammunition (AP & DD) and fire control…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic anti-tank suicide bombers/close assault. in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
suicide bombers can fight in close combat*, they just cant declare a charge against the unit.
However in this case its the embarked unit thats effectively counter-charging the bomber.
*they dont have the ‘unarmed’ rule… now they IIRC they can chose to use the AT mine as their weapon – aka remove both models :p or ‘boot knife’
-
Nat replied to the topic Points cost and odd stats in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
hi,
As IO pointed out the ship stats are taken from the realworld, which is why some guns of the same approx calibare have different AP and traits. The ships fire control systems and the Nations ammunition manufacturing affects the range of the weapons.
And yes the points across the book are messed up and make little sense…
However you then…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Continued delay of Regia Marina models! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
hmmm…..
It looks / sounds like its all hands to the pump to hit the promise of getting the BP Epic ACW out at the end of the month…..
-
Nat replied to the topic Light Guns/AA in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
1) light guns using DP are light guns that are able to shoot flights, they by pass Tough & Very Tough but are used during the ships activation -this has been confirmed by the Author on Social Media, if you check out the ‘news from the wardroom!’ thread I’ve put up a flights 101 guide which has all the references of how they work. There is also a…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Moving artillery onto the table in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
1) – yes pg 95
2) as heavy AT gun, no it can only pivot (pg 95)
3) heavy artilery needs a TOW, light /medium can be man handeled
4)see 3 -
Nat replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 5 months ago
Hi Peter, welcome.. if you pop your head in to the Victory as Sea forum ‘news from the wardroom’ thread I’ve uploaded some comunity done info sheets that should help with the rules.
-
Nat replied to the topic Introduction to 'Victory At Sea' in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
Ok… dont know why this wasnt put up here either! Offical unboxing video
-
Nat replied to the topic Late war french army, post operation dragoon in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 5 months ago
By this point in the war the Free French where entirely equipped by the US
however 1st Army (France) – Wikipedia as a whole…but if you focus on 2nd Armored Division (France) – Wikipedia
Also if you look at Campaign : Battle of the Bulge it has a Free French Europe platoon.
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 3 years, 5 months ago
One of the Wardroom members posted this up, so I thought I’d share it here as well.
This one way of doing approximately balance points lists from the two player set. No refits are taken on any ship.
IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY
Medium Priority. Total Points: 710
2x Mogami-Class Heavy Cruisers
3x Fubuki-Class Destroyers
High Priority. Total…[Read more] - Load More