Nat

Activity

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    no you havent got wrong… its 1 pin per firing unit…. unless the firing unit has HE or a flamethrower in which case those pins will take precidence.

    ie 5 rifles will be 1 pin

    5 rifles and a rifle grenade will be D2 pins

    5 rifles and a flamethrower will be D6+1 pins

     

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    picture attached… cant quote page number as I’m looking at an ebook version… but it says roll once, apply then roll again (unless the vehicle is destroyed by the first result, of course)

    Ok the same paragraph then goes on to look like its contradicting its self by saying roll two dice and apply both results…….can we get some proof readers…[Read more]

  • 1) Each brigade needs to have an individual commander

    2) As you pointed out there are options within V2 for your General to be just another Brigade commander – just with the posiblity of being a higher staff rateing -note how prussians cant have a SR 7 brigade commander….

    3)As per the  BPv2 General Viarent  you mentioned (warrior General pg 1…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    @stuart – its in the massive damage rules… ok I’ve paraphrased it as I typed that from memory 🙁  how ever as I said in #179522 you cant have a rule that says roll 2 damage and apply both unles the 1st is destroyed and then have another one that says roll X damage and apply all of them because the X damage came from 2 separte weapons

    Also -…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    But wouldnt ‘passenger affected as normal’ just mean that they follow the normal vehicle destroyed rules?

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    So we have in the instructions for massive damage this quote “(unless the vehicle is destroyed by the first result, of course)”

    So if I get to apply 2 resutls unless its destroyed why would I be able to roll all D6 +1 flamerthower damage hits even if (for example) the first one destroys the vehicle?

     

    Now my under standing is shooting V…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    @nI know – good point I never said anything about order of resolution 😛

     

    @stuart…except the part of the rules that literally says don’t apply anymore damage results and remove the vehicle as soon as you get a damage result!

     

     

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Blood Red Skies 4 years, 6 months ago

    Hi bill, no it doesn’t affect the hand size… it is just removed from the deck before the game starts so you start with one fewer card.

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Blood Red Skies 4 years, 6 months ago

    If you download the faq or read the updated rules in air strike you’ll find a dirgam that shows you -yes the front arrow must be in the rear arc to get tailing

  • Nat replied to the topic Units on transport in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    No the unit is NOT hit by the weapon that hits the transport vehicle… they are hit by sharpnel and debris of the vehicle.   THis is why you get get PEN bonus to the wound rolls.  Source is the FAQ.

     

    As they are not hit by the flamethrower but rather the vehicle they where inside they only test if they lose 50%

  • Nat replied to the topic 1809 French in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    sorry only seem to have posted half of what I was going to say!

     

    The extrapulation (as I dont have the peninuslar box either) is that they are made to fit WLs rules… that is a battalion of 24 models with 4 grenadiers, 4 voltiguers and a command group as thats what the pictures on the store show (which seem to be pretty accurate)

  • Nat replied to the topic 1809 French in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    Warlord late war Battalions are 24 single piece models, with pack and heads separate  8 which had epaulettes.  There are multiple different Shakos

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    That makes sense, however in the Clash of Eagles light infantry do have the special note – skirmish – yet you also have Russians Line Units with the rule ‘poor skirmisher’ which states that they dont benefit from the +1 bonus for skirmishers shooting…. when they can only do that in mixed formation (Russians dont have the option to form compisite…[Read more]

  • Personally I stick the metal model to the bottom of the base then fill it up with a putty to levelish of the metal base.

    Other approaches are to cut the metal base off and then pin the model to the base, or trim the metal down

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    So we have 2 conflicting absolutes… on one hand tiny units section says they can only can form march column (but only on roads and tracks… unlike all other units that can form it any where) or their default of skirmish order.   Then on the other hand you have the statement that all regular units can form square.

     

    personally I’d take the sp…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Chaplins in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 6 months ago

    The major Chaplin is found in the konflict47 part of the store.

    but to re iterate what IO said..any officer should do with proper painting

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    Ok got my pdf rule versionon to the iPad!

    Sorry the formation is just called skirmish order as stated pg 22 in the v2 pdf.   Pg 24 makes it quite clear that tiny units can only be in skirmish order, so they can’t form square.

    also in Napoleonic you can have normal and large units in skirmish order…

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago

    Do tiny infantry have must form square?  I thought they could only form skirmish formation?

  • Nat replied to the topic Tanks reaction fire in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 7 months ago

    just to clarify  turrets can rotate unless they’ve suffered a turret jam result then they are locked in to a set arc….although I know not all clubs play the turret jam rules…

  • Nat replied to the topic Tanks reaction fire in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 7 months ago

    A tank is a unit the same as an MMG team or a rifle squad and doesnt have an exception in the rule to how orders work….Basically if it doesnt have an ambush order or no order next to it then no it cant reaction fire.

     

  • Load More