Nathan Rich

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #162134
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Thank you very much for your answers. I´ve already planned to buy Sea Lion and Gigant.
    Really excited to field Mark IV and Mark C Hornet then.
    Thanks.

    #148775
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Hey there,
    I´ve now added all the new suggestions and ideas and have completed Version 3 of the Army List.
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148661
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Hello John! Thanks for the feedback and the suggestions! The Pacific Coast Milita Rangers are “ancestors” of the modern day Canadian Rangers military forces of the Canadian Army (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Rangers). I appreciate your ideas and will add them or change them in my Army List. Thanks.
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148537
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Thank you Richard!
    I will change the things you have mentioned.
    What do you think about the new Units I have added to the list and that the Army Special Rule is now a National characteristic which is an important change I guess?
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148526
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Hello everybody!
    I am really sorry that it has taken me so long to overhaul the Canadian Army List, but I had several things to do. Sorry.

    However, I have now finally overhauled the Army List, using the community´s hints and suggestions. Again thank you!
    I hope that I have understood the suggestions right and would be very happy about feedback concerning my new Version of the Canadian Army List.

    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148039
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    These are very good ideas. I will now start working on the overhauled version. I guess I will be able to publish it in the following two days.
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148019
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Thanks again Richard.
    I especially appreciate your idea with the inexperienced Units being Green.
    I also like the idea of the experimental Tanks always have to pass an order test.
    But I think I would also Contain the possibility of making the Canadians Stubborn, because of the If-Day. I think it is a very interesting “story” Behind the rule and is also warrantable.
    I still think about what to do with the Skink. However I think it would be Best to erase the Hispano-Suiza Cannon Option, because at least they are normal Light Automatic Cannons like Stuart Harrison has already mentioned.
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #148008
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    Thanks for your Feedback, Stuart!
    I see your point and actually I finally see that there are Major flaws in my thoughts about the Canadian Army List. I don’t know why I haven’t seen it in the first place.
    I will also change that and will delete the Hispano-Suiza Cannon Option. You are right, it is not realistic and way to overpowered. I don’t know what made me create this rule. I will Post a overhauled Version soon.
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

    #147842
    Nathan Rich
    Participant

    First of all: Thank you very much for your detailed Feedback, Richard!
    What made me chose those Special rules: The If-Day was a day during the IIWW were the Canadian Army disguised as German Soldiers and simulated the Invasion of a Canadian City to made the Population buy more warbonds (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_Day) however, I agree to you that Fanatic for +1 Point is too much. I think I will leave it with Stubborn.
    I also agree to you that the additional pinning markers are to hard. At the Moment I´ve created this rules I thought it a good idea, because the Canadian Soldiers were mostly volunteers who never really fought before and were Kind of shrikers, but Maybe I will stick to making the Inexperienced Units Shrikers and reduce their Point Costs.
    I´ve Chosen the Land Assault rule, because I was quite sure that the canadians were known for attacks with Landing Crafts and so were also trained in Fighting in shallow water. I think it would be smart to only give this rule to the Canadian Land Assault Forces Section.
    The other two Campaign Characteristics are like you mentioned somehow overpowered and I am not sure why I´ve created them.
    I actually think that I have overhaul the Army List and reupload the new Version of it in a few days.
    I would be happy if you would respond to my proposed changes and I would be happy About Feedback About the new Units I´ve created in that Army List.
    And thank you for your Feedback!
    Sincerely
    Nathan Rich

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)