Activity
-
Peter replied to the topic Ridiculous weapons rules in the forum Bolt Action 9 hours ago
I disagree with that. It’s no longer a B&P game. The second edition can be described as such. BA third edition plays like a different timeline or a kind of multiverse. It has absolutely nothing to do with reality. For that kind of game, WLG actually has Conflict 47.
If you even equate weapons that could hardly be more different, then you don’t…[Read more]
-
Peter started the topic Ridiculous weapons rules in the forum Bolt Action 3 days ago
I just read the article on the new US Army Army book and I have a question. Who comes up with something so ridiculous? The rules for weapons (number of rounds and distance) make no sense at all anymore.
A light mortar in V3 now has the same range (36”) as an MG42. In reality, a light mortar had a range of approx. 550m and was intended for…[Read more]
-
Peter replied to the topic FUBAR vehicles panic reation in the forum Bolt Action 3 days ago
The topic with V3 starts with the rulebook itself. It is not possible for 80% to fully understand the rules if WL itself explains the rules incorrectly.
Example:
Page 96, diagram14This diagram is shown incorrectly and the funniest and stupidest thing is that it was shown correctly in V2.
So they deliberately changed a picture, which is now…[Read more] -
Peter replied to the topic best paints to use? in the forum Bolt Action 3 days ago
I use Vallejo and AK 3rd Gen with a brush and Vallejo Air and Tamiya with my airbrush.
-
Peter replied to the topic FUBAR vehicles panic reation in the forum Bolt Action 7 days ago
It’s not about balance. This is lazy gameplay writing.
I invest money and time in a model and then it gets destroyed because of a random dice result because it just drives away?You give the player the opportunity to use more vehicles. Then you weaken them with FUBAR, failed order tests and this ridiculous MG rule.
At the same time, you make all…[Read more]
-
Peter replied to the topic Motorcycle Sidecar in the forum Bolt Action 7 days ago
I understand what you mean, but then you can’t charge money for it. I would accept that for a free PDF and a first edition, but the rulebook itself is full of errors. Diagrams are wrong, cross-references are wrong and some rule explanations that were still there in the second edition are missing.
The promise was that nothing would be changed that…[Read more]
-
Peter replied to the topic Motorcycle Sidecar in the forum Bolt Action 8 days ago
I realise that the game is not historically accurate. But it should at least follow a certain logic in the game itself. Then a motorbike with an MG costs 10 points more and the issue is settled.
It seems to me as if all these rule changes were decided completely at random without even thinking about whether they make sense.
-
Peter started the topic Motorcycle Sidecar in the forum Bolt Action 8 days ago
Am I reading it correctly that a motorcycle with sidecar and machine gun may only stand and shoot? It is not allowed to perform an Advance (driving and shooting)?
It is nothing more than a pintle mounted MG on a vehicle. Driver and gunner are two separate models.
But cavalry can perform an Advance?
I just don’t understand these 3rd edition…[Read more]
-
Peter replied to the topic FUBAR vehicles panic reation in the forum Bolt Action 8 days ago
I still don’t understand that there was really someone at Warlord Games who thought that these rules made sense and were useful for the game.
-
Peter replied to the topic Firearms Issues in the forum Bolt Action 24 days ago
Bolt Action V3 is neither a historical nor a realistic game. With version 3, the decision has been made to publish a fantasy game set during the Second World War.
It’s not just the weapon rules, which very often don’t make sense. It’s the rules in general. I could list countless ones.Why they decided to change the rules so much can only be…[Read more]
-
Peter became a registered member 2 months ago