Artillery being charged.

Home Forums Historical Black Powder Artillery being charged.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #185830
    Keith Davison
    Participant

    Forgive the question from a newb to BP, but I had a game last night and a question arose that neither I nor my opponent could answer.

    Picture the scene, an undamaged cavalry unit charges a cannon. In closing fire, 2 hits are inflicted on the cavalry but it passes it break test and closes in for the combat. Battles ensues, but after the attacks and saving throws neither side has inflicted any hand-to-hand casualties.

    Question 1. Is this classed as a draw, in which case whilst the cavalry takes a break test what does the artillery do? I could see rules for infantry but not artillery in this situation. Do they take a break test, ie they would break as per all close combat tests.

    Question 2. Do the two casualties inflicted in the closing fire count towards the combat resolution? Ie in my example did the cavalry have 2 against it and therefore losing the combat?

    I can’t rule out an inability to read properly when we checked the rules, but we couldn’t see a solution?
    Thanks

    #185831
    Big Al
    Participant

    Answering in reverse

    2) No, casualties caused by closing fire do not count towards Combat Resolution, but they do count in the following break test if that unit loses the combat.

    1) the combat is a draw. Neither side has to take a break test because neither side lost. Nor did either side become shaken (stamina level reached) so again, no break test required. After a drawn combat, any unit that is shaken must take a break test. It does not mean that the other side won, it is still a drawn combat. Indeed, both sides could be shaken and so take a break test.

    after a drawn combat, all cavalry retires. No break test required, they just fall back.

     

    Hope that clarifies for you.

    #185832
    Garry Wills
    Participant

    So the cavalry passed the charge to contact break test using the shooting line on the break test, as in the FAQ 2010, rather than the RAW.

    #185833
    Mike
    Participant

    The FAQ that Garry refers to…

    The Quick Reference Sheet (QRS) states that a break test is required for units suffering artillery casualties
    from closing fire (b. Test if Shaken or suffering artillery casualties from closing fire). Because the best
    result that cavalry can get from such a test is ‘retire’ this makes it practically impossible for cavalry to
    charge home onto artillery (they would have to suffer zero casualties from 3 shots per cannon requiring 3+
    to hit and -2 saves).
    This is a case of a rule being added a little late in the day and not quite being explained properly. Originally we had things
    arranged so that only Shaken units tested – and this works well enough. After a while we felt that units taking artillery
    casualties on the way in – but not being Shaken – should also have to test their resolve to see if they charged home. What we
    failed to make clear is that this test should be taken using the Shooting results on the Break Test, and not the Hand-to-Hand
    results as you would for a Shaken unit. As the testing unit would have charged into position at the point the test is made, a
    result of ‘unit holds its ground’ means that the charge is successfully completed and the charger and artillery are engaged in
    combat. With the usual -1 modifier for artillery casualties this means a test score of 7 or better will see the unit charge home
    successfully.
    Some players do prefer to use more artillery that we typically might – and the relatively narrow frontage of artillery pieces
    does make closing fire from massed guns even more effective than reality would suggest. Where a unit charges onto multiple
    guns we’d recommend allowing only a single gun to shoot closing fire – this is plenty dangerous enough without making such
    attacks suicidal

    #185834
    Keith Davison
    Participant

    Thanks for these responses. I think it’s because it doesn’t mention artillery in the case of a drawn combat that we weren’t sure what to do.

    #185835
    Big Al
    Participant

    Mike, I always wondered why the break test for Closing Fire used the Hand to Hand result, especially as the test, if taken at all, happens before any close combat had occurred. However, this has always been the case, even in the original rulebook. You just don’t charge artillery head on with cavalry because they’ll never make it. Skirmishers are the best thing for a frontal attack on artillery, really.

    In Hand to Hand, Artillery is very weak and vulnerable. Every break test result is Break and it cannot be supported, so closing fire is the only real chance it has at surviving contact with the enemy.

    #185836
    Nat
    Participant

    If you think your Napoleonic Artillery is going to end up in combat then Spanish is the way to go…..as they get to hold and not just break :p

     

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.