Is there part of a rule missing in shieldwall supplement
Home › Forums › Historical › Hail Caesar › Is there part of a rule missing in shieldwall supplement
- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 7 months ago by Nat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2021 at 3:44 am #185035skh25Participant
Is there errata for the shieldwall special rule in shieldwall? It mentions the downside of possible routing battleline if a unit in shieldwall breaks, but doesn’t list a negative effect, only the positives. I have come up with my own in that supporting units testing because the primary broke at a -1. Just wondering what the actual rule was supposed to be…
March 23, 2021 at 1:54 pm #185046Charge The GunsParticipantHi Skh25. I don’t believe there is anything missing from the Shiedwall special rule. I suspect the bit you are reading in the description is just hyperbole, and not expected to translate in to some tangible part of the rule. In Shieldwall your defence/resilience increases, you are less effective offensively, and you are slower. Seems a fair enough balance to me.
March 24, 2021 at 8:31 am #185060NatParticipantOh so background mixed in the rules paraghraphs again…..
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.