Is there part of a rule missing in shieldwall supplement

Home › Forums › Historical › Hail Caesar › Is there part of a rule missing in shieldwall supplement

  • This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Nat.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 23, 2021 at 3:44 am #185035
    skh25
    Participant

    Is there errata for the shieldwall special rule in shieldwall? It mentions the downside of possible routing battleline if a unit in shieldwall breaks, but doesn’t list a negative effect, only the positives. I have come up with my own in that supporting units testing because the primary broke at a -1. Just wondering what the actual rule was supposed to be…

    March 23, 2021 at 1:54 pm #185046
    Charge The Guns
    Participant

    Hi Skh25.  I don’t believe there is anything missing from the Shiedwall special rule.  I suspect the bit you are reading in the description is just hyperbole, and not expected to translate in to some tangible part of the rule.  In Shieldwall your defence/resilience increases, you are less effective offensively, and you are slower.  Seems a fair enough balance to me.

    March 24, 2021 at 8:31 am #185060
    Nat
    Participant

    Oh so background mixed in the rules paraghraphs again…..

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.