Proof reading

[Rich]

Hi all,

Really tempted to try VAS but I hate errata (it’s a thing for me…)
I was put off CS by the 10 pages of errata – is the proof reading any better for VAS?

[Enioch]

Well, for one thing, Königsberg is a Battleship (apparently) :-), and I’m pretty sure some DDs are missing their ASW suites. I don’t think we’ve had any official errata out yet, too (by all means, correct me if I’m wrong).

 

[Lord Snotrag]

Scharnhorst as a cruiser is also kinda pushing it.  The rulebook comes out in January with what I hope will be up to date ship lists and stats.  I’ll kinda play it by ear until then.

 

[Nat]

Currently there is no erata… as already mentioned the rulebook hasnt been released (due end of Jan) so all we have is a Quick Start Rule booklet….

There has been feed back to warlord about typos in the cards, but the cards will just be player aids and (hopefully) over ruled by the mainbook

 

[Rich]

OK – thanks all.  I’ll hold on for a bit and check the forum!

[Chimpy]

On the model of the Scharnhorst it’s described as a Battleship on the base. Maybe the cruiser designation on the card is used for something else in the main rules but it’s probably a typo.

[Author]

Posts